History of medicine – Wikipedia

The history of medicine shows how societies have changed in their approach to illness and disease from ancient times to the present. Early medical traditions include those of Babylon, China, Egypt and India. Sushruta, from India, introduced the concepts of medical diagnosis and prognosis. The Hippocratic Oath was written in […]

The history of medicine shows how societies have changed in their approach to illness and disease from ancient times to the present. Early medical traditions include those of Babylon, China, Egypt and India. Sushruta, from India, introduced the concepts of medical diagnosis and prognosis. The Hippocratic Oath was written in ancient Greece in the 5th century BCE, and is a direct inspiration for oaths of office that physicians swear upon entry into the profession today. In the Middle Ages, surgical practices inherited from the ancient masters were improved and then systematized in Rogerius’s The Practice of Surgery. Universities began systematic training of physicians around 1220 CE in Italy.

Invention of the microscope was a consequence of improved understanding, during the Renaissance. Prior to the 19th century, humorism (also known as humoralism) was thought to explain the cause of disease but it was gradually replaced by the germ theory of disease, leading to effective treatments and even cures for many infectious diseases. Military doctors advanced the methods of trauma treatment and surgery. Public health measures were developed especially in the 19th century as the rapid growth of cities required systematic sanitary measures. Advanced research centers opened in the early 20th century, often connected with major hospitals. The mid-20th century was characterized by new biological treatments, such as antibiotics. These advancements, along with developments in chemistry, genetics, and radiography led to modern medicine. Medicine was heavily professionalized in the 20th century, and new careers opened to women as nurses (from the 1870s) and as physicians (especially after 1970).

Prehistoric medicine[edit]

Although there is little record to establish when plants were first used for medicinal purposes (herbalism), the use of plants as healing agents, as well as clays and soils is ancient. Over time, through emulation of the behavior of fauna, a medicinal knowledge base developed and passed between generations. Even earlier, Neanderthals may have engaged in medical practices.[1]
As tribal culture specialized specific castes, shamans and apothecaries fulfilled the role of healer.[2]
The first known dentistry dates to c. 7000 BC in Baluchistan where Neolithic dentists used flint-tipped drills and bowstrings.[3] The first known trepanning operation was carried out c. 5000 BC in Ensisheim, France.[4] A possible amputation was carried out c. 4,900 BC in Buthiers-Bulancourt, France.[5]

Early civilizations[edit]


Medical recipe concerning poisoning. Terracotta tablet, from Nippur, Iraq, 18th century BCE. Ancient Orient Museum, Istanbul

Monumental stone relief of a fish-garbed figure from the Temple of Ninurta in the Assyrian city of Kalhu, believed by some experts to be a representation of an āšipu, or exorcist-priest,[6]:83 who functioned as a kind of healer and primitive doctor[7]

The ancient Mesopotamians had no distinction between “rational science” and magic.[8][9][10] When a person became ill, doctors would prescribe both magical formulas to be recited as well as medicinal treatments.[8][9][10][7] The earliest medical prescriptions appear in Sumerian during the Third Dynasty of Ur (c. 2112 BC – c. 2004 BC).[11] The oldest Babylonian texts on medicine date back to the Old Babylonian period in the first half of the 2nd millennium BCE.[12] The most extensive Babylonian medical text, however, is the Diagnostic Handbook written by the ummânū, or chief scholar, Esagil-kin-apli of Borsippa,[13][14] during the reign of the Babylonian king Adad-apla-iddina (1069–1046 BCE).[15] Along with the Egyptians, the Babylonians introduced the practice of diagnosis, prognosis, physical examination, and remedies. In addition, the Diagnostic Handbook introduced the methods of therapy and cause. The text contains a list of medical symptoms and often detailed empirical observations along with logical rules used in combining observed symptoms on the body of a patient with its diagnosis and prognosis.[16] The Diagnostic Handbook was based on a logical set of axioms and assumptions, including the modern view that through the examination and inspection of the symptoms of a patient, it is possible to determine the patient’s disease, its cause and future development, and the chances of the patient’s recovery. The symptoms and diseases of a patient were treated through therapeutic means such as bandages, herbs and creams.[13]

In East Semitic cultures, the main medicinal authority was a kind of exorcist-healer known as an āšipu.[8][9][10] The profession was generally passed down from father to son[8] and was held in extremely high regard.[8] Of less frequent recourse was another kind of healer known as an asu, who corresponds more closely to a modern physician[7] and treated physical symptoms using primarily folk remedies composed of various herbs, animal products, and minerals, as well as potions, enemas, and ointments or poultices.[7] These physicians, who could be either male or female, also dressed wounds, set limbs, and performed simple surgeries.[7] The ancient Mesopotamians also practiced prophylaxis[7] and took measures to prevent the spread of disease.[7]

Mental illnesses were well known in ancient Mesopotamia,[17] where diseases and mental disorders were believed to be caused by specific deities.[6] Because hands symbolized control over a person, mental illnesses were known as “hands” of certain deities.[6] One psychological illness was known as Qāt Ištar, meaning “Hand of Ishtar”.[6] Others were known as “Hand of Shamash”, “Hand of the Ghost”, and “Hand of the God”.[6] Descriptions of these illnesses, however, are so vague that it is usually impossible to determine which illnesses they correspond to in modern terminology.[6] Mesopotamian doctors kept detailed record of their patients’ hallucinations and assigned spiritual meanings to them.[17] A patient who hallucinated that he was seeing a dog was predicted to die;[17] whereas, if he saw a gazelle, he would recover.[17] The royal family of Elam was notorious for its members frequently suffering from insanity.[17]Erectile dysfunction was recognized as being rooted in psychological problems.[17]


Ancient Egypt developed a large, varied and fruitful medical tradition. Herodotus described the Egyptians as “the healthiest of all men, next to the Libyans”,[18] because of the dry climate and the notable public health system that they possessed. According to him, “the practice of medicine is so specialized among them that each physician is a healer of one disease and no more.” Although Egyptian medicine, to a considerable extent, dealt with the supernatural,[19] it eventually developed a practical use in the fields of anatomy, public health, and clinical diagnostics.

Medical information in the Edwin Smith Papyrus may date to a time as early as 3000 BC.[20]Imhotep in the 3rd dynasty is sometimes credited with being the founder of ancient Egyptian medicine and with being the original author of the Edwin Smith Papyrus, detailing cures, ailments and anatomical observations. The Edwin Smith Papyrus is regarded as a copy of several earlier works and was written c. 1600 BC. It is an ancient textbook on surgery almost completely devoid of magical thinking and describes in exquisite detail the examination, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of numerous ailments.[21]

The Kahun Gynaecological Papyrus[22] treats women’s complaints, including problems with conception. Thirty four cases detailing diagnosis and[23] treatment survive, some of them fragmentarily.[24] Dating to 1800 BCE, it is the oldest surviving medical text of any kind.

Medical institutions, referred to as Houses of Life are known to have been established in ancient Egypt as early as 2200 BC.[25]

The Ebers Papyrus is the oldest written text mentioning enemas. Many medications were administered by enemas and one of the many types of medical specialists was an Iri, the Shepherd of the Anus.[26]

The earliest known physician is also credited to ancient Egypt: Hesy-Ra, “Chief of Dentists and Physicians” for King Djoser in the 27th century BCE.[27] Also, the earliest known woman physician, Peseshet, practiced in Ancient Egypt at the time of the 4th dynasty. Her title was “Lady Overseer of the Lady Physicians.” In addition to her supervisory role, Peseshet trained midwives at an ancient Egyptian medical school in Sais.[28]


The Atharvaveda, a sacred text of Hinduism dating from the Early Iron Age, is one of the first Indian texts dealing with medicine. The Atharvaveda also contains prescriptions of herbs for various ailments. The use of herbs to treat ailments would later form a large part of Ayurveda.

Ayurveda, meaning the “complete knowledge for long life” is another medical system of India. Its two most famous texts belong to the schools of Charaka and Sushruta. The earliest foundations of Ayurveda were built on a synthesis of traditional herbal practices together with a massive addition of theoretical conceptualizations, new nosologies and new therapies dating from about 600 BCE onwards, and coming out of the communities of thinkers which included the Buddha and others.[29]

According to the compendium of Charaka, the Charakasamhitā, health and disease are not predetermined and life may be prolonged by human effort. The compendium of Suśruta, the Suśrutasamhitā defines the purpose of medicine to cure the diseases of the sick, protect the healthy, and to prolong life. Both these ancient compendia include details of the examination, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of numerous ailments. The Suśrutasamhitā is notable for describing procedures on various forms of surgery, including rhinoplasty, the repair of torn ear lobes, perineal lithotomy, cataract surgery, and several other excisions and other surgical procedures. Most remarkable is Sushruta’s penchant for scientific classification:
His medical treatise consists of 184 chapters, 1,120 conditions are listed, including injuries and illnesses relating to aging and mental illness.

The Ayurvedic classics mention eight branches of medicine: kāyācikitsā (internal medicine), śalyacikitsā (surgery including anatomy), śālākyacikitsā (eye, ear, nose, and throat diseases), kaumārabhṛtya (pediatrics with obstetrics and gynaecology), bhūtavidyā (spirit and psychiatric medicine), agada tantra (toxicology with treatments of stings and bites), rasāyana (science of rejuvenation), and vājīkaraṇa (aphrodisiac and fertility). Apart from learning these, the student of Āyurveda was expected to know ten arts that were indispensable in the preparation and application of his medicines: distillation, operative skills, cooking, horticulture, metallurgy, sugar manufacture, pharmacy, analysis and separation of minerals, compounding of metals, and preparation of alkalis. The teaching of various subjects was done during the instruction of relevant clinical subjects. For example, the teaching of anatomy was a part of the teaching of surgery, embryology was a part of training in pediatrics and obstetrics, and the knowledge of physiology and pathology was interwoven in the teaching of all the clinical disciplines.
The normal length of the student’s training appears to have been seven years. But the physician was to continue to learn.[30]

As an alternative form of medicine in India, Unani medicine found deep roots and royal patronage during medieval times. It progressed during the Indian sultanate and mughal periods. Unani medicine is very close to Ayurveda. Both are based on the theory of the presence of the elements (in Unani, they are considered to be fire, water, earth, and air) in the human body. According to followers of Unani medicine, these elements are present in different fluids and their balance leads to health and their imbalance leads to illness.[31]

By the 18th century CE, Sanskrit medical wisdom still dominated. Muslim rulers built large hospitals in 1595 in Hyderabad, and in Delhi in 1719, and numerous commentaries on ancient texts were written.[32]


Assorted dried plant and animal parts used in traditional Chinese medicines, clockwise from top left corner: dried Lingzhi (lit. “spirit mushrooms”), ginseng, Luo Han Guo, turtle shell underbelly (plastron), and dried curled snakes

China also developed a large body of traditional medicine. Much of the philosophy of traditional Chinese medicine derived from empirical observations of disease and illness by Taoist physicians and reflects the classical Chinese belief that individual human experiences express causative principles effective in the environment at all scales. These causative principles, whether material, essential, or mystical, correlate as the expression of the natural order of the universe.

The foundational text of Chinese medicine is the Huangdi neijing, (or Yellow Emperor’s Inner Canon), written 5th century to 3rd century BCE.[33] Near the end of the 2nd century CE, during the Han dynasty, Zhang Zhongjing, wrote a Treatise on Cold Damage, which contains the earliest known reference to the Neijing Suwen. The Jin Dynasty practitioner and advocate of acupuncture and moxibustion, Huangfu Mi (215–282), also quotes the Yellow Emperor in his Jiayi jing, c. 265. During the Tang Dynasty, the Suwen was expanded and revised and is now the best extant representation of the foundational roots of traditional Chinese medicine. Traditional Chinese Medicine that is based on the use of herbal medicine, acupuncture, massage and other forms of therapy has been practiced in China for thousands of years.

In the 18th century, during the Qing dynasty, there was a proliferation of popular books as well as more advanced encyclopedias on traditional medicine. Jesuit missionaries introduced Western science and medicine to the royal court, although the Chinese physicians ignored them.[34]

Finally in the 19th century, Western medicine was introduced at the local level by Christian medical missionaries from the London Missionary Society (Britain), the Methodist Church (Britain) and the Presbyterian Church (US). Benjamin Hobson (1816–1873) in 1839, set up a highly successful Wai Ai Clinic in Guangzhou, China.[35] The Hong Kong College of Medicine for Chinese was founded in 1887 by the London Missionary Society, with its first graduate (in 1892) being Sun Yat-sen, who later led the Chinese Revolution (1911). The Hong Kong College of Medicine for Chinese was the forerunner of the School of Medicine of the University of Hong Kong, which started in 1911.

Because of the social custom that men and women should not be near to one another, the women of China were reluctant to be treated by male doctors. The missionaries sent women doctors such as Dr. Mary Hannah Fulton (1854–1927). Supported by the Foreign Missions Board of the Presbyterian Church (US) she in 1902 founded the first medical college for women in China, the Hackett Medical College for Women, in Guangzhou.[36]

Historiography of Chinese Medicine[edit]

When reading the Chinese classics, it is important for scholars to examine these works from the Chinese perspective. Historians have noted two key aspects of Chinese medical history: understanding conceptual differences when translating the term “shén”, and observing the history from the perspective of cosmology rather than biology.[37]

In Chinese classical texts, the term “shén” is the closest historical translation to the English word “body” because it sometimes refers to the physical human body in terms of being weighed or measured, but the term is to be understood as an “ensemble of functions” encompassing both the human psyche and emotions.[38] This concept of the human body is opposed to the European duality of a separate mind and body.[39] It is critical for scholars to understand the fundamental differences in concepts of the body in order to connect the medical theory of the classics to the “human organism” it is explaining.[40]

Chinese scholars established a correlation between the cosmos and the “human organism.” The basic components of cosmology, qi, yin yang and the Five Phase theory, were used to explain health and disease in texts such as Huangdi neijing.[41]Yin and yang are the changing factors in cosmology, with qi as the vital force or energy of life. The Five phase theory Wu Xing of the Han dynasty contains the elements wood, fire, earth, metal, and water. By understanding medicine from a cosmology perspective, historians better understand Chinese medical and social classifications such as gender, which was defined by a domination or remission of yang in terms of yin.

These two distinctions are imperative when analyzing the history of traditional Chinese medical science.

A majority of Chinese medical history written after the classical canons comes in the form of primary source case studies where academic physicians record the illness of a particular person and the healing techniques used, as well as their effectiveness.[42] Historians have noted that Chinese scholars wrote these studies instead of “books of prescriptions or advice manuals;” in their historical and environmental understanding, no two illnesses were alike so the healing strategies of the practitioner was unique every time to the specific diagnosis of the patient.[43] Medical case studies existed throughout Chinese history, but “individually authored and published case history” was a prominent creation of the Ming Dynasty.[44] An example such case studies would be the literati physician, Cheng Congzhou, collection of 93 cases published in 1644.[45]

Greece and Roman Empire[edit]

Around 800 BCE Homer in The Iliad gives descriptions of wound treatment by the two sons of Asklepios, the admirable physicians Podaleirius and Machaon and one acting doctor, Patroclus. Because Machaon is wounded and Podaleirius is in combat Eurypylus asks Patroclus to cut out this arrow from my thigh, wash off the blood with warm water and spread soothing ointment on the wound.[46] Asklepios like Imhotep becomes god of healing over time.

View of the Askleipion of Kos, the best preserved instance of an Asklepieion.

Temples dedicated to the healer-god Asclepius, known as Asclepieia (Ancient Greek: Ἀσκληπιεῖα, sing. Ἀσκληπιεῖον, ‘Asclepieion), functioned as centers of medical advice, prognosis, and healing.[47] At these shrines, patients would enter a dream-like state of induced sleep known as enkoimesis (ἐγκοίμησις) not unlike anesthesia, in which they either received guidance from the deity in a dream or were cured by surgery.[48] Asclepeia provided carefully controlled spaces conducive to healing and fulfilled several of the requirements of institutions created for healing.[47] In the Asclepeion of Epidaurus, three large marble boards dated to 350 BCE preserve the names, case histories, complaints, and cures of about 70 patients who came to the temple with a problem and shed it there. Some of the surgical cures listed, such as the opening of an abdominal abscess or the removal of traumatic foreign material, are realistic enough to have taken place, but with the patient in a state of enkoimesis induced with the help of soporific substances such as opium.[48]Alcmaeon of Croton wrote on medicine between 500 and 450 BCE. He argued that channels linked the sensory organs to the brain, and it is possible that he discovered one type of channel, the optic nerves, by dissection.[49]


A towering figure in the history of medicine was the physician Hippocrates of Kos (c. 460 – c. 370 BCE), considered the “father of modern medicine.”[50][51] The Hippocratic Corpus is a collection of around seventy early medical works from ancient Greece strongly associated with Hippocrates and his students. Most famously, the Hippocratics invented the Hippocratic Oath for physicians. Contemporary physicians swear an oath of office which includes aspects found in early editions of the Hippocratic Oath.

Hippocrates and his followers were first to describe many diseases and medical conditions. Though humorism (humoralism) as a medical system predates 5th-century Greek medicine, Hippocrates and his students systemetized the thinking that illness can be explained by an imbalance of blood, phlegm, black bile, and yellow bile.[52] Hippocrates is given credit for the first description of clubbing of the fingers, an important diagnostic sign in chronic suppurative lung disease, lung cancer and cyanotic heart disease. For this reason, clubbed fingers are sometimes referred to as “Hippocratic fingers”.[53] Hippocrates was also the first physician to describe the Hippocratic face in Prognosis. Shakespeare famously alludes to this description when writing of Falstaff’s death in Act II, Scene iii. of Henry V.[54]

Hippocrates began to categorize illnesses as acute, chronic, endemic and epidemic, and use terms such as, “exacerbation, relapse, resolution, crisis, paroxysm, peak, and convalescence.”[55][56][57]

Another of Hippocrates’s major contributions may be found in his descriptions of the symptomatology, physical findings, surgical treatment and prognosis of thoracic empyema, i.e. suppuration of the lining of the chest cavity. His teachings remain relevant to present-day students of pulmonary medicine and surgery. Hippocrates was the first documented person to practise cardiothoracic surgery, and his findings are still valid.

Some of the techniques and theories developed by Hippocrates are now put into practice by the fields of Environmental and Integrative Medicine. These include recognizing the importance of taking a complete history which includes environmental exposures as well as foods eaten by the patient which might play a role in his or her illness.

Herophilus and Erasistratus[edit]

The plinthios brochos as described by Greek physician Heraklas, a sling for binding a fractured jaw. These writings were preserved in one of Oribasius’ collections.[58]

Two great Alexandrians laid the foundations for the scientific study of anatomy and physiology, Herophilus of Chalcedon and Erasistratus of Ceos.[59] Other Alexandrian surgeons gave us ligature (hemostasis), lithotomy, hernia operations, ophthalmic surgery, plastic surgery, methods of reduction of dislocations and fractures, tracheotomy, and mandrake as an anaesthetic. Some of what we know of them comes from Celsus and Galen of Pergamum.[60]

Herophilus of Chalcedon, working at the medical school of Alexandria placed intelligence in the brain, and connected the nervous system to motion and sensation. Herophilus also distinguished between veins and arteries, noting that the latter pulse while the former do not. He and his contemporary, Erasistratus of Chios, researched the role of veins and nerves, mapping their courses across the body. Erasistratus connected the increased complexity of the surface of the human brain compared to other animals to its superior intelligence. He sometimes employed experiments to further his research, at one time repeatedly weighing a caged bird, and noting its weight loss between feeding times. In Erasistratus’ physiology, air enters the body, is then drawn by the lungs into the heart, where it is transformed into vital spirit, and is then pumped by the arteries throughout the body. Some of this vital spirit reaches the brain, where it is transformed into animal spirit, which is then distributed by the nerves.[61]


The Greek Galen (c. 129–216 AD) was one of the greatest physicians of the ancient world, studying and traveling widely in ancient Rome. He dissected animals to learn about the body, and performed many audacious operations—including brain and eye surgeries—that were not tried again for almost two millennia. In Ars medica (“Arts of Medicine”), he explained mental properties in terms of specific mixtures of the bodily parts.[62][63]

Galen’s medical works were regarded as authoritative until well into the Middle Ages. Galen left a physiological model of the human body that became the mainstay of the medieval physician’s university anatomy curriculum, but it suffered greatly from stasis and intellectual stagnation because some of Galen’s ideas were incorrect; he did not dissect a human body.[64] Greek and Roman taboos had meant that dissection was usually banned in ancient times, but in the Middle Ages it changed.[65][66]

In 1523 Galen’s On the Natural Faculties was published in London. In the 1530s Belgian anatomist and physician Andreas Vesalius launched a project to translate many of Galen’s Greek texts into Latin. Vesalius’s most famous work, De humani corporis fabrica was greatly influenced by Galenic writing and form.[67]

Roman contributions[edit]

The Romans invented numerous surgical instruments, including the first instruments unique to women,[68] as well as the surgical uses of forceps, scalpels, cautery, cross-bladed scissors, the surgical needle, the sound, and speculas.[69][70] Romans also performed cataract surgery.[71]

The Roman army physician Dioscorides (c. 40–90 CE), was a Greek botanist and pharmacologist. He wrote the encyclopedia De Materia Medica describing over 600 herbal cures, forming an influential pharmacopoeia which was used extensively for the following 1,500 years.[72]

Early Christians in the Roman Empire incorporated medicine into their theology, ritual practices, and metaphors.[73]

The Middle Ages, 400 to 1400[edit]

Byzantine Empire and Sassanid Empire[edit]

Byzantine medicine encompasses the common medical practices of the Byzantine Empire from about 400 AD to 1453 AD. Byzantine medicine was notable for building upon the knowledge base developed by its Greco-Roman predecessors. In preserving medical practices from antiquity, Byzantine medicine influenced Islamic medicine as well as fostering the Western rebirth of medicine during the Renaissance.

Byzantine physicians often compiled and standardized medical knowledge into textbooks. Their records tended to include both diagnostic explanations and technical drawings. The Medical Compendium in Seven Books, written by the leading physician Paul of Aegina, survived as a particularly thorough source of medical knowledge. This compendium, written in the late seventh century, remained in use as a standard textbook for the following 800 years.

Late antiquity ushered in a revolution in medical science, and historical records often mention civilian hospitals (although battlefield medicine and wartime triage were recorded well before Imperial Rome). Constantinople stood out as a center of medicine during the Middle Ages, which was aided by its crossroads location, wealth, and accumulated knowledge.

The first ever known example of separating conjoined twins occurred in the Byzantine Empire in the 10th century. The next example of separating conjoined twins will be first recorded many centuries later in Germany in 1689.[74][75]

The Byzantine Empire’s neighbors, the Persian Sassanid Empire, also made their noteworthy contributions mainly with the establishment of the Academy of Gondeshapur, which was “the most important medical center of the ancient world during the 6th and 7th centuries.”[76] In addition, Cyril Elgood, British physician and a historian of medicine in Persia, commented that thanks to medical centers like the Academy of Gondeshapur, “to a very large extent, the credit for the whole hospital system must be given to Persia.”[77]

Islamic world[edit]

Arabic manuscript, Anatomy of the Eye, by al-Mutadibih, 1200 CE

The Islamic civilization rose to primacy in medical science as its physicians contributed significantly to the field of medicine, including anatomy, ophthalmology, pharmacology, pharmacy, physiology, and surgery. The Arabs were influenced by ancient Indian, Persian, Greek, Roman and Byzantine medical practices, and helped them develop further.[78]Galen & Hippocrates were pre-eminent authorities. The translation of 129 of Galen’s works into Arabic by the Nestorian Christian Hunayn ibn Ishaq and his assistants, and in particular Galen’s insistence on a rational systematic approach to medicine, set the template for Islamic medicine, which rapidly spread throughout the Arab Empire.[79] Its most famous physicians included the Persian polymaths Muhammad ibn Zakariya al-Razi and Avicenna, who wrote more than 40 works on health, medicine, and well-being. Taking leads from Greece and Rome, Islamic scholars kept both the art and science of medicine alive and moving forward.[80] Persian polymath Avicenna has also been called the “father of medicine”.[81] He wrote The Canon of Medicine which became a standard medical text at many medieval European universities,[82] considered one of the most famous books in the history of medicine.[83]The Canon of Medicine presents an overview of the contemporary medical knowledge of the medieval Islamic world, which had been influenced by earlier traditions including Greco-Roman medicine (particularly Galen),[84]Persian medicine, Chinese medicine and Indian medicine. Persian physician Muhammad ibn Zakarīya Rāzi[85] was one of the first to question the Greek theory of humorism, which nevertheless remained influential in both medieval Western and medieval Islamic medicine.[86] Some volumes of Muhammad ibn Zakarīya Rāzi’s work Al-Mansuri, namely “On Surgery” and “A General Book on Therapy”, became part of the medical curriculum in European universities.[87] Additionally, he has been described as a doctor’s doctor,[88] the father of pediatrics,[89][90] and a pioneer of ophthalmology. For example, he was the first to recognize the reaction of the eye’s pupil to light.[90]


After AD 400, the study and practice of medicine in the Western Roman Empire went into deep decline. Medical services were provided, especially for the poor, in the thousands of monastic hospitals that sprang up across Europe, but the care was rudimentary and mainly palliative.[91] Most of the writings of Galen and Hippocrates were lost to the West, with the summaries and compendia of St. Isidore of Seville being the primary channel for transmitting Greek medical ideas.[92] The Carolingian renaissance brought increased contact with Byzantium and a greater awareness of ancient medicine,[93] but only with the twelfth-century renaissance and the new translations coming from Muslim and Jewish sources in Spain, and the fifteenth-century flood of resources after the fall of Constantinople did the West fully recover its acquaintance with classical antiquity.

Greek and Roman taboos had meant that dissection was usually banned in ancient times, but in the Middle Ages it changed: medical teachers and students at Bologna began to open human bodies, and Mondino de Luzzi (c. 1275–1326) produced the first known anatomy textbook based on human dissection.[65][66]

Wallis identifies a prestige hierarchy with university educated physicians on top, followed by learned surgeons; craft-trained surgeons; barber surgeons; itinerant specialists such as dentist and oculists; empirics; and midwives.[94]


The first medical schools were opened in the 9th century, most notably the Schola Medica Salernitana at Salerno in southern Italy. The cosmopolitan influences from Greek, Latin, Arabic, and Hebrew sources gave it an international reputation as the Hippocratic City. Students from wealthy families came for three years of preliminary studies and five of medical studies. The medicine, following the laws of Federico II, that he founded in 1224 the University ad improved the Schola Salernitana, in the period between 1200 and 1400, it had in Sicily (so-called Sicilian Middle Ages) a particular development so much to create a true school of Jewish medicine.[95]

As a result of which, after a legal examination, was conferred to a Jewish Sicilian woman, Virdimura, wife of another physician Pasquale of Catania, the hystorical record of before woman officially trained to exercise of the medical profession.[96]

By the thirteenth century, the medical school at Montpellier began to eclipse the Salernitan school. In the 12th century, universities were founded in Italy, France, and England, which soon developed schools of medicine. The University of Montpellier in France and Italy’s University of Padua and University of Bologna were leading schools. Nearly all the learning was from lectures and readings in Hippocrates, Galen, Avicenna, and Aristotle. In later centuries, the importance of universities founded in the late Middle Ages gradually increased, e.g. Charles University in Prague (established in 1348), Jagiellonian University in Cracow (1364), University of Vienna (1365), Heidelberg University (1386) and University of Greifswald (1456).


The underlying principle of most medieval medicine was Galen’s theory of humours. This was derived from the ancient medical works, and dominated all western medicine until the 19th century. The theory stated that within every individual there were four humours, or principal fluids—black bile, yellow bile, phlegm, and blood, these were produced by various organs in the body, and they had to be in balance for a person to remain healthy. Too much phlegm in the body, for example, caused lung problems; and the body tried to cough up the phlegm to restore a balance. The balance of humours in humans could be achieved by diet, medicines, and by blood-letting, using leeches. The four humours were also associated with the four seasons, black bile-autumn, yellow bile-summer, phlegm-winter and blood-spring.[97]

Healing included both physical and spiritual therapeutics, such as the right herbs, a suitable diet, clean bedding, and the sense that care was always at hand. Other procedures used to help patients included the Mass, prayers, relics of saints, and music used to calm a troubled mind or quickened pulse.[98]


In 1376, in Sicily, it was historically given, in relationship to the laws of Federico II that they foresaw an examination with a regal errand of physicists, the first qualification to the exercise of the medicine to a woman, Virdimura a Jewess of Catania, whose document is preserved in Palermo to the Italian national archives.[99]

Renaissance to early modern period 16th–18th century[edit]

The Renaissance brought an intense focus on scholarship to Christian Europe. A major effort to translate the Arabic and Greek scientific works into Latin emerged. Europeans gradually became experts not only in the ancient writings of the Romans and Greeks, but in the contemporary writings of Islamic scientists. During the later centuries of the Renaissance came an increase in experimental investigation, particularly in the field of dissection and body examination, thus advancing our knowledge of human anatomy.[100]

The development of modern neurology began in the 16th century in Italy and France with Niccolò Massa, Jean Fernel, Jacques Dubois and Andreas Vesalius. Vesalius described in detail the anatomy of the brain and other organs; he had little knowledge of the brain’s function, thinking that it resided mainly in the ventricles. Over his lifetime he corrected over 200 of Galen’s mistakes. Understanding of medical sciences and diagnosis improved, but with little direct benefit to health care. Few effective drugs existed, beyond opium and quinine. Folklore cures and potentially poisonous metal-based compounds were popular treatments.
Independently from Ibn al-Nafis, Michael Servetus rediscovered the pulmonary circulation, but this discovery did not reach the public because it was written down for the first time in the “Manuscript of Paris”[101] in 1546, and later published in the theological work which he paid with his life in 1553. Later this was perfected by Renaldus Columbus and Andrea Cesalpino.

In 1628 the English physician William Harvey made a ground-breaking discovery when he correctly described the circulation of the blood in his Exercitatio Anatomica de Motu Cordis et Sanguinis in Animalibus. Before this time the most useful manual in medicine used both by students and expert physicians was Dioscorides’ De Materia Medica, a pharmacopoeia.

Bacteria and protists were first observed with a microscope by Antonie van Leeuwenhoek in 1676, initiating the scientific field of microbiology.[102]


Paracelsus (1493–1541), was an erratic and abusive innovator who rejected Galen and bookish knowledge, calling for experimental research, with heavy doses of mysticism, alchemy and magic mixed in. He rejected sacred magic (miracles) under Church auspisces and looked for cures in nature.[103] He preached but he also pioneered the use of chemicals and minerals in medicine. His hermetical views were that sickness and health in the body relied on the harmony of man (microcosm) and Nature (macrocosm). He took an approach different from those before him, using this analogy not in the manner of soul-purification but in the manner that humans must have certain balances of minerals in their bodies, and that certain illnesses of the body had chemical remedies that could cure them.[104] Most of his influence came after his death. Paracelsus is a highly controversial figure in the history of medicine, with most experts hailing him as a Father of Modern Medicine for shaking off religious orthodoxy and inspiring many researchers; others say he was a mystic more than a scientist and downplay his importance.[105][106]

Padua and Bologna[edit]

University training of physicians began in the 13th century.

The University of Padua was founded about 1220 by walkouts from the University of Bologna, and began teaching medicine in 1222. It played a leading role in the identification and treatment of diseases and ailments, specializing in autopsies and the inner workings of the body.[107] Starting in 1595, Padua’s famous anatomical theatre drew artists and scientists studying the human body during public dissections. The intensive study of Galen led to critiques of Galen modeled on his own writing, as in the first book of Vesalius’s De humani corporis fabrica. Andreas Vesalius held the chair of Surgery and Anatomy (explicator chirurgiae) and in 1543 published his anatomical discoveries in De Humani Corporis Fabrica. He portrayed the human body as an interdependent system of organ groupings. The book triggered great public interest in dissections and caused many other European cities to establish anatomical theatres.[108]

At the University of Bologna the training of physicians began in 1219. The Italian city attracted students from across Europe. Taddeo Alderotti built a tradition of medical education that established the characteristic features of Italian learned medicine and was copied by medical schools elsewhere. Turisanus (d. 1320) was his student.[109] The curriculum was revised and strengthened in 1560–1590.[110] A representative professor was Julius Caesar Aranzi (Arantius) (1530–89). He became Professor of Anatomy and Surgery at the University of Bologna in 1556, where he established anatomy as a major branch of medicine for the first time. Aranzi combined anatomy with a description of pathological processes, based largely on his own research, Galen, and the work of his contemporary Italians. Aranzi discovered the ‘Nodules of Aranzio’ in the semilunar valves of the heart and wrote the first description of the superior levator palpebral and the coracobrachialis muscles. His books (in Latin) covered surgical techniques for many conditions, including hydrocephalus, nasal polyp, goitre and tumours to phimosis, ascites, haemorrhoids, anal abscess and fistulae.[111]


Catholic women played large roles in health and healing in medieval and early modern Europe.[112] A life as a nun was a prestigious role; wealthy families provided dowries for their daughters, and these funded the convents, while the nuns provided free nursing care for the poor.[113]

The Catholic elites provided hospital services because of their theology of salvation that good works were the route to heaven. The Protestant reformers rejected the notion that rich men could gain God’s grace through good works—and thereby escape purgatory—by providing cash endowments to charitable institutions. They also rejected the Catholic idea that the poor patients earned grace and salvation through their suffering.[114] Protestants generally closed all the convents[115] and most of the hospitals, sending women home to become housewives, often against their will.[116] On the other hand, local officials recognized the public value of hospitals, and some were continued in Protestant lands, but without monks or nuns and in the control of local governments.[117]

In London, the crown allowed two hospitals to continue their charitable work, under nonreligious control of city officials.[118] The convents were all shut down but Harkness finds that women—some of them former nuns—were part of a new system that delivered essential medical services to people outside their family. They were employed by parishes and hospitals, as well as by private families, and provided nursing care as well as some medical, pharmaceutical, and surgical services.[119]

Meanwhile, in Catholic lands such as France, rich families continued to fund convents and monasteries, and enrolled their daughters as nuns who provided free health services to the poor. Nursing was a religious role for the nurse, and there was little call for science.[120]

Age of Enlightenment[edit]

18th-century medical remedies collected by a British Gentry family

During the Age of Enlightenment, the 18th century, science was held in high esteem and physicians upgraded their social status by becoming more scientific. The health field was crowded with self-trained barber-surgeons, apothecaries, midwives, drug peddlers, and charlatans.

Across Europe medical schools relied primarily on lectures and readings. The final year student would have limited clinical experience by trailing the professor through the wards. Laboratory work was uncommon, and dissections were rarely done because of legal restrictions on cadavers. Most schools were small, and only Edinburgh, Scotland, with 11,000 alumni, produced large numbers of graduates.[121][122]


In Britain, there were but three small hospitals after 1550. Pelling and Webster estimate that in London in the 1580 to 1600 period, out of a population of nearly 200,000 people, there were about 500 medical practitioners. Nurses and midwives are not included. There were about 50 physicians, 100 licensed surgeons, 100 apothecaries, and 250 additional unlicensed practitioners. In the last category about 25% were women.[123] All across Britain—and indeed all of the world—the vast majority of the people in city, town or countryside depended for medical care on local amateurs with no professional training but with a reputation as wise healers who could diagnose problems and advise sick people what to do—and perhaps set broken bones, pull a tooth, give some traditional herbs or brews or perform a little magic to cure what ailed them.

The London Dispensary opened in 1696, the first clinic in the British Empire to dispense medicines to poor sick people. The innovation was slow to catch on, but new dispensaries were open in the 1770s. In the colonies, small hospitals opened in Philadelphia in 1752, New York in 1771, and Boston (Massachusetts General Hospital) in 1811.[124]

Guy’s Hospital, the first great British hospital with a modern foundation opened in 1721 in London, with funding from businessman Thomas Guy. It had been preceded by St Bartholomew’s Hospital and St Thomas’s Hospital, both medieval foundations. In 1821 a bequest of £200,000 by William Hunt in 1829 funded expansion for an additional hundred beds at Guy’s. Samuel Sharp (1709–78), a surgeon at Guy’s Hospital from 1733 to 1757, was internationally famous; his A Treatise on the Operations of Surgery (1st ed., 1739), was the first British study focused exclusively on operative technique.[125]

English physician Thomas Percival (1740–1804) wrote a comprehensive system of medical conduct, Medical Ethics; or, a Code of Institutes and Precepts, Adapted to the Professional Conduct of Physicians and Surgeons (1803) that set the standard for many textbooks.[126]

Spain and Spanish Empire[edit]

In the Spanish Empire, the viceregal capital of Mexico City was a site of medical training for physicians and the creation of hospitals. Epidemic disease had decimated indigenous populations starting with the early sixteenth-century Spanish conquest of the Aztec empire, when a black auxiliary in the armed forces of conqueror Hernán Cortés, with an active case of smallpox, set off a virgin land epidemic among indigenous peoples, Spanish allies and enemies alike. Aztec emperor Cuitlahuac died of smallpox.[127][128] Disease was a significant factor in the Spanish conquest elsewhere as well.[129]

Medical education instituted at the Royal and Pontifical University of Mexico chiefly served the needs of urban elites. Male and female curanderos or lay practitioners, attended to the ills of the popular classes. The Spanish crown began regulating the medical profession just a few years after the conquest, setting up the Royal Tribunal of the Protomedicato, a board for licensing medical personnel in 1527. Licensing became more systematic after 1646 with physicians, druggists, surgeons, and bleeders requiring a license before they could publicly practice.[130] Crown regulation of medical practice became more general in the Spanish empire.[131]

Elites and the popular classes alike called on divine intervention in personal and society-wide health crises, such as the epidemic of 1737. The intervention of the Virgin of Guadalupe was depicted in a scene of dead and dying Indians, with elites on their knees praying for her aid. In the late eighteenth century, the crown began implementing secularizing policies on the Iberian peninsula and its overseas empire to control disease more systematically and scientifically.[132][133][134]

Spanish Quest for Medicinal Spices[edit]

Botanical medicines also became popular during the 16th, 17th, and 18th Centuries. Spanish pharmaceutical books during this time contain medicinal recipes consisting of spices, herbs, and other botanical products. For example, nutmeg oil was documented for curing stomach ailments and cardamom oil was believed to relieve intestinal ailments.[135] During the rise of the global trade market, spices and herbs, along with many other goods, that were indigenous to different territories began to appear in different locations across the globe. Herbs and spices were especially popular for their utility in cooking and medicines. As a result of this popularity and increased demand for spices, some areas in Asia, like China and Indonesia, became hubs for spice cultivation and trade.[136] The Spanish Empire also wanted to benefit from the international spice trade, so they looked towards their American colonies.

The Spanish American colonies became an area where the Spanish searched to discover new spices and indigenous American medicinal recipes. The Florentine Codex, a 16th-century ethnographic research study in Mesoamerica by the Spanish Franciscan friar Bernardino de Sahagún, is a major contribution to the history of Nahua medicine.[137] The Spanish did discover many spices and herbs new to them, some of which were reportedly similar to Asian spices. A Spanish physician by the name of Nicolás Monardes studied many of the American spices coming into Spain. He documented many of the new American spices and their medicinal properties in his survey Historia medicinal de las cosas que se traen de nuestras Indias Occidentales. For example, Monardes describes the “Long Pepper” (Pimienta luenga), found along the coasts of the countries that are now known Panama and Colombia, as a pepper that was more flavorful, healthy, and spicy in comparison to the Eastern black pepper.[135] The Spanish interest in American spices can first be seen in the commissioning of the Libellus de Medicinalibus Indorum Herbis, which was a Spanish-American codex describing indigenous American spices and herbs and describing the ways that these were used in natural Aztec medicines. The codex was commissioned in the year 1552 by Francisco de Mendoza, the son of Antonio de Mendoza, who was the first Viceroy of New Spain.[135] Francisco de Mendoza was interested in studying the properties of these herbs and spices, so that he would be able to profit from the trade of these herbs and the medicines that could be produced by them.

Francisco de Mendoza recruited the help of Monardez in studying the traditional medicines of the indigenous people living in what was then the Spanish colonies. Monardez researched these medicines and performed experiments to discover the possibilities of spice cultivation and medicine creation in the Spanish colonies. The Spanish transplanted some herbs from Asia, but only a few foreign crops were successfully grown in the Spanish Colonies. One notable crop brought from Asia and successfully grown in the Spanish colonies was ginger, as it was considered Hispaniola’s number 1 crop at the end of the 16th Century.[135] The Spanish Empire did profit from cultivating herbs and spices, but they also introduced pre-Columbian American medicinal knowledge to Europe. Other Europeans were inspired by the actions of Spain and decided to try to establish a botanical transplant system in colonies that they controlled, however these subsequent attempts were not successful.[136]

19th century: rise of modern medicine[edit]

The practice of medicine changed in the face of rapid advances in science, as well as new approaches by physicians. Hospital doctors began much more systematic analysis of patients’ symptoms in diagnosis.[138] Among the more powerful new techniques were anaesthesia, and the development of both antiseptic and aseptic operating theatres.[139] Effective cures were developed for certain endemic infectious diseases. However the decline in many of the most lethal diseases was due more to improvements in public health and nutrition than to advances in medicine.[citation needed]

Medicine was revolutionized in the 19th century and beyond by advances in chemistry, laboratory techniques, and equipment. Old ideas of infectious disease epidemiology were gradually replaced by advances in bacteriology and virology.[102]

Germ theory and bacteriology[edit]

In the 1830s in Italy, Agostino Bassi traced the silkworm disease muscardine to microorganisms. Meanwhile, in Germany, Theodor Schwann led research on alcoholic fermentation by yeast, proposing that living microorganisms were responsible.
Leading chemists, such as Justus von Liebig, seeking solely physicochemical explanations, derided this claim and alleged that Schwann was regressing to vitalism.

In 1847 in Vienna, Ignaz Semmelweis (1818–1865), dramatically reduced the death rate of new mothers (due to childbed fever) by requiring physicians to clean their hands before attending childbirth, yet his principles were marginalized and attacked by professional peers.[140] At that time most people still believed that infections were caused by foul odors called miasmas.

Eminent French scientist Louis Pasteur confirmed Schwann’s fermentation experiments in 1857 and afterwards supported the hypothesis that yeast were microorganisms. Moreover, he suggested that such a process might also explain contagious disease. In 1860, Pasteur’s report on bacterial fermentation of butyric acid motivated fellow Frenchman Casimir Davaine to identify a similar species (which he called bacteridia) as the pathogen of the deadly disease anthrax. Others dismissed “bacteridia” as a mere byproduct of the disease. British surgeon Joseph Lister, however, took these findings seriously and subsequently introduced antisepsis to wound treatment in 1865.

German physician Robert Koch, noting fellow German Ferdinand Cohn’s report of a spore stage of a certain bacterial species, traced the life cycle of Davaine’s bacteridia, identified spores, inoculated laboratory animals with them, and reproduced anthrax—a breakthrough for experimental pathology and germ theory of disease. Pasteur’s group added ecological investigations confirming spores’ role in the natural setting, while Koch published a landmark treatise in 1878 on the bacterial pathology of wounds. In 1881, Koch reported discovery of the “tubercle bacillus”, cementing germ theory and Koch’s acclaim.

Upon the outbreak of a cholera epidemic in Alexandria, Egypt, two medical missions went to investigate and attend the sick, one was sent out by Pasteur and the other led by Koch.[141] Koch’s group returned in 1883, having successfully discovered the cholera pathogen.[141] In Germany, however, Koch’s bacteriologists had to vie against Max von Pettenkofer, Germany’s leading proponent of miasmatic theory.[142] Pettenkofer conceded bacteria’s casual involvement, but maintained that other, environmental factors were required to turn it pathogenic, and opposed water treatment as a misdirected effort amid more important ways to improve public health.[142] The massive cholera epidemic in Hamburg in 1892 devastasted Pettenkoffer’s position, and yielded German public health to “Koch’s bacteriology”.[142]

On losing the 1883 rivalry in Alexandria, Pasteur switched research direction, and introduced his third vaccine—rabies vaccine—the first vaccine for humans since Jenner’s for smallpox.[141] From across the globe, donations poured in, funding the founding of Pasteur Institute, the globe’s first biomedical institute, which opened in 1888.[141] Along with Koch’s bacteriologists, Pasteur’s group—which preferred the term microbiology—led medicine into the new era of “scientific medicine” upon bacteriology and germ theory.[141] Accepted from Jakob Henle, Koch’s steps to confirm a species’ pathogenicity became famed as “Koch’s postulates”. Although his proposed tuberculosis treatment, tuberculin, seemingly failed, it soon was used to test for infection with the involved species. In 1905, Koch was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, and remains renowned as the founder of medical microbiology.[143]


Women as nurses[edit]

Women had always served in ancillary roles, and as midwives and healers. The professionalization of medicine forced them increasingly to the sidelines. As hospitals multiplied they relied in Europe on orders of Roman Catholic nun-nurses, and German Protestant and Anglican deaconesses in the early 19th century. They were trained in traditional methods of physical care that involved little knowledge of medicine. The breakthrough to professionalization based on knowledge of advanced medicine was led by Florence Nightingale in England. She resolved to provide more advanced training than she saw on the Continent. At Kaiserswerth, where the first German nursing schools were founded in 1836 by Theodor Fliedner, she said, “The nursing was nil and the hygiene horrible.”[144]) Britain’s male doctors preferred the old system, but Nightingale won out and her Nightingale Training School opened in 1860 and became a model. The Nightingale solution depended on the patronage of upper-class women, and they proved eager to serve. Royalty became involved. In 1902 the wife of the British king took control of the nursing unit of the British army, became its president, and renamed it after herself as the Queen Alexandra’s Royal Army Nursing Corps; when she died the next queen became president. Today its Colonel In Chief is Sophie, Countess of Wessex, the daughter-in-law of Queen Elizabeth II. In the United States, upper-middle-class women who already supported hospitals promoted nursing. The new profession proved highly attractive to women of all backgrounds, and schools of nursing opened in the late 19th century. They soon a function of large hospitals, where they provided a steady stream of low-paid idealistic workers. The International Red Cross began operations in numerous countries in the late 19th century, promoting nursing as an ideal profession for middle-class women.[145]

The Nightingale model was widely copied. Linda Richards (1841–1930) studied in London and became the first professionally trained American nurse. She established nursing training programs in the United States and Japan, and created the first system for keeping individual medical records for hospitalized patients.[146] The Russian Orthodox Church sponsored seven orders of nursing sisters in the late 19th century. They ran hospitals, clinics, almshouses, pharmacies, and shelters as well as training schools for nurses. In the Soviet era (1917–1991), with the aristocratic sponsors gone, nursing became a low-prestige occupation based in poorly maintained hospitals.[147]

Women as physicians[edit]

It was very difficult for women to become doctors in any field before the 1970s. Elizabeth Blackwell (1821–1910) became the first woman to formally study and practice medicine in the United States. She was a leader in women’s medical education. While Blackwell viewed medicine as a means for social and moral reform, her student Mary Putnam Jacobi (1842–1906) focused on curing disease. At a deeper level of disagreement, Blackwell felt that women would succeed in medicine because of their humane female values, but Jacobi believed that women should participate as the equals of men in all medical specialties using identical methods, values and insights.[148] In the Soviet Union although the majority of medical doctors were women, they were paid less than the mostly male factory workers.[149]


Paris (France) and Vienna were the two leading medical centers on the Continent in the era 1750–1914.

In the 1770s–1850s Paris became a world center of medical research and teaching. The “Paris School” emphasized that teaching and research should be based in large hospitals and promoted the professionalization of the medical profession and the emphasis on sanitation and public health. A major reformer was Jean-Antoine Chaptal (1756–1832), a physician who was Minister of Internal Affairs. He created the Paris Hospital, health councils, and other bodies.[150]

Louis Pasteur (1822–1895) was one of the most important founders of medical microbiology. He is remembered for his remarkable breakthroughs in the causes and preventions of diseases. His discoveries reduced mortality from puerperal fever, and he created the first vaccines for rabies and anthrax. His experiments supported the germ theory of disease. He was best known to the general public for inventing a method to treat milk and wine in order to prevent it from causing sickness, a process that came to be called pasteurization. He is regarded as one of the three main founders of microbiology, together with Ferdinand Cohn and Robert Koch. He worked chiefly in Paris and in 1887 founded the Pasteur Institute there to perpetuate his commitment to basic research and its practical applications. As soon as his institute was created, Pasteur brought together scientists with various specialties. The first five departments were directed by Emile Duclaux (general microbiology research) and Charles Chamberland (microbe research applied to hygiene), as well as a biologist, Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov (morphological microbe research) and two physicians, Jacques-Joseph Grancher (rabies) and Emile Roux (technical microbe research). One year after the inauguration of the Institut Pasteur, Roux set up the first course of microbiology ever taught in the world, then entitled Cours de Microbie Technique (Course of microbe research techniques). It became the model for numerous research centers around the world named “Pasteur Institutes.”[151][152]


The First Viennese School of Medicine, 1750–1800, was led by the Dutchman Gerard van Swieten (1700–1772), who aimed to put medicine on new scientific foundations—promoting unprejudiced clinical observation, botanical and chemical research, and introducing simple but powerful remedies. When the Vienna General Hospital opened in 1784, it at once became the world’s largest hospital and physicians acquired a facility that gradually developed into the most important research centre.[153] Progress ended with the Napoleonic wars and the government shutdown in 1819 of all liberal journals and schools; this caused a general return to traditionalism and eclecticism in medicine.[154]

Vienna was the capital of a diverse empire and attracted not just Germans but Czechs, Hungarians, Jews, Poles and others to its world-class medical facilities. After 1820 the Second Viennese School of Medicine emerged with the contributions of physicians such as Carl Freiherr von Rokitansky, Josef Škoda, Ferdinand Ritter von Hebra, and Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis. Basic medical science expanded and specialization advanced. Furthermore, the first dermatology, eye, as well as ear, nose, and throat clinics in the world were founded in Vienna. The textbook of ophthalmologist Georg Joseph Beer (1763–1821) Lehre von den Augenkrankheiten combined practical research and philosophical speculations, and became the standard reference work for decades.[155]


After 1871 Berlin, the capital of the new German Empire, became a leading center for medical research. Robert Koch (1843–1910) was a representative leader. He became famous for isolating Bacillus anthracis (1877), the Tuberculosis bacillus (1882) and Vibrio cholerae (1883) and for his development of Koch’s postulates. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1905 for his tuberculosis findings. Koch is one of the founders of microbiology, inspiring such major figures as Paul Ehrlich and Gerhard Domagk.[152]

U.S. Civil War[edit]

In the American Civil War (1861–65), as was typical of the 19th century, more soldiers died of disease than in battle, and even larger numbers were temporarily incapacitated by wounds, disease and accidents.[156] Conditions were poor in the Confederacy, where doctors and medical supplies were in short supply.[157] The war had a dramatic long-term impact on medicine in the U.S., from surgical technique to hospitals to nursing and to research facilities. Weapon development -particularly the appearance of Springfield Model 1861, mass-produced and much more accurate than muskets led to generals underestimating the risks of long range rifle fire; risks exemplified in the death of John Sedgwick and the disastrous Pickett’s Charge. The rifles could shatter bone forcing amputation and longer ranges meant casualties were sometimes not quickly found. Evacuation of the wounded from Second Battle of Bull Run took a week.[158] As in earlier wars, untreated casualties sometimes survived unexpectedly due to maggots debriding the wound -an observation which led to the surgical use of maggots -still a useful method in the absence of effective antibiotics.

The hygiene of the training and field camps was poor, especially at the beginning of the war when men who had seldom been far from home were brought together for training with thousands of strangers. First came epidemics of the childhood diseases of chicken pox, mumps, whooping cough, and, especially, measles. Operations in the South meant a dangerous and new disease environment, bringing diarrhea, dysentery, typhoid fever, and malaria. There were no antibiotics, so the surgeons prescribed coffee, whiskey, and quinine. Harsh weather, bad water, inadequate shelter in winter quarters, poor policing of camps, and dirty camp hospitals took their toll.[159]

This was a common scenario in wars from time immemorial, and conditions faced by the Confederate army were even worse. The Union responded by building army hospitals in every state. What was different in the Union was the emergence of skilled, well-funded medical organizers who took proactive action, especially in the much enlarged United States Army Medical Department,[160] and the United States Sanitary Commission, a new private agency.[161] Numerous other new agencies also targeted the medical and morale needs of soldiers, including the United States Christian Commission as well as smaller private agencies.[162]

The U.S. Army learned many lessons and in August 1886, it established the Hospital Corps.

Statistical methods[edit]

Diagram of the causes of mortality in the army in the East” by Florence Nightingale.

A major breakthrough in epidemiology came with the introduction of statistical maps and graphs. They allowed careful analysis of seasonality issues in disease incidents, and the maps allowed public health officials to identify critical loci for the dissemination of disease. John Snow in London developed the methods. In 1849, he observed that the symptoms of cholera, which had already claimed around 500 lives within a month, were vomiting and diarrhoea. He concluded that the source of contamination must be through ingestion, rather than inhalation as was previously thought. It was this insight that resulted in the removal of The Pump On Broad Street, after which deaths from cholera plummeted afterwards. English nurse Florence Nightingale pioneered analysis of large amounts of statistical data, using graphs and tables, regarding the condition of thousands of patients in the Crimean War to evaluate the efficacy of hospital services. Her methods proved convincing and led to reforms in military and civilian hospitals, usually with the full support of the government.[163][164][165]

By the late 19th and early 20th century English statisticians led by Francis Galton, Karl Pearson and Ronald Fisher developed the mathematical tools such as correlations and hypothesis tests that made possible much more sophisticated analysis of statistical data.[166]

During the U.S. Civil War the Sanitary Commission collected enormous amounts of statistical data, and opened up the problems of storing information for fast access and mechanically searching for data patterns. The pioneer was John Shaw Billings (1838–1913). A senior surgeon in the war, Billings built the Library of the Surgeon General’s Office (now the National Library of Medicine), the centerpiece of modern medical information systems.[167] Billings figured out how to mechanically analyze medical and demographic data by turning facts into numbers and punching the numbers onto cardboard cards that could be sorted and counted by machine. The applications were developed by his assistant Herman Hollerith; Hollerith invented the punch card and counter-sorter system that dominated statistical data manipulation until the 1970s. Hollerith’s company became International Business Machines (IBM) in 1911.[168]

Worldwide dissemination[edit]

United States[edit]

Johns Hopkins Hospital, founded in 1889, originated several modern medical practices, including residency and rounds.


European ideas of modern medicine were spread widely through the world by medical missionaries, and the dissemination of textbooks. Japanese elites enthusiastically embraced Western medicine after the Meiji Restoration of the 1860s. However they had been prepared by their knowledge of the Dutch and German medicine, for they had some contact with Europe through the Dutch. Highly influential was the 1765 edition of Hendrik van Deventer’s pioneer work Nieuw Ligt (“A New Light”) on Japanese obstetrics, especially on Katakura Kakuryo’s publication in 1799 of Sanka Hatsumo (“Enlightenment of Obstetrics”).[169][170] A cadre of Japanese physicians began to interact with Dutch doctors, who introduced smallpox vaccinations. By 1820 Japanese ranpô medical practitioners not only translated Dutch medical texts, they integrated their readings with clinical diagnoses. These men became leaders of the modernization of medicine in their country. They broke from Japanese traditions of closed medical fraternities and adopted the European approach of an open community of collaboration based on expertise in the latest scientific methods.[171]

Kitasato Shibasaburō (1853–1931) studied bacteriology in Germany under Robert Koch. In 1891 he founded the Institute of Infectious Diseases in Tokyo, which introduced the study of bacteriology to Japan. He and French researcher Alexandre Yersin went to Hong Kong in 1894, where; Kitasato confirmed Yersin’s discovery that the bacterium Yersinia pestis is the agent of the plague. In 1897 he isolates and described the organism that caused dysentery. He became the first dean of medicine at Keio University, and the first president of the Japan Medical Association.[172][173]

Japanese physicians immediately recognized the values of X-Rays. They were able to purchase the equipment locally from the Shimadzu Company, which developed, manufactured, marketed, and distributed X-Ray machines after 1900.[174] Japan not only adopted German methods of public health in the home islands, but implemented them in its colonies, especially Korea and Taiwan, and after 1931 in Manchuria.[175] A heavy investment in sanitation resulted in a dramatic increase of life expectancy.[176]


The Quaker-run York Retreat, founded in 1796, gained international prominence as a centre for moral treatment and a model of asylum reform following the publication of Samuel Tuke’s Description of the Retreat (1813).

Until the nineteenth century, the care of the insane was largely a communal and family responsibility rather than a medical one. The vast majority of the mentally ill were treated in domestic contexts with only the most unmanageable or burdensome likely to be institutionally confined.[177] This situation was transformed radically from the late eighteenth century as, amid changing cultural conceptions of madness, a new-found optimism in the curability of insanity within the asylum setting emerged.[178] Increasingly, lunacy was perceived less as a physiological condition than as a mental and moral one[179] to which the correct response was persuasion, aimed at inculcating internal restraint, rather than external coercion.[180] This new therapeutic sensibility, referred to as moral treatment, was epitomised in French physician Philippe Pinel’s quasi-mythological unchaining of the lunatics of the Bicêtre Hospital in Paris[181] and realised in an institutional setting with the foundation in 1796 of the Quaker-run York Retreat in England.[23]

From the early nineteenth century, as lay-led lunacy reform movements gained in influence,[182] ever more state governments in the West extended their authority and responsibility over the mentally ill.[183] Small-scale asylums, conceived as instruments to reshape both the mind and behaviour of the disturbed,[184] proliferated across these regions.[185] By the 1830s, moral treatment, together with the asylum itself, became increasingly medicalised[186] and asylum doctors began to establish a distinct medical identity with the establishment in the 1840s of associations for their members in France, Germany, the United Kingdom and America, together with the founding of medico-psychological journals.[23] Medical optimism in the capacity of the asylum to cure insanity soured by the close of the nineteenth century as the growth of the asylum population far outstripped that of the general population.[a][187] Processes of long-term institutional segregation, allowing for the psychiatric conceptualisation of the natural course of mental illness, supported the perspective that the insane were a distinct population, subject to mental pathologies stemming from specific medical causes.[184] As degeneration theory grew in influence from the mid-nineteenth century,[188] heredity was seen as the central causal element in chronic mental illness,[189] and, with national asylum systems overcrowded and insanity apparently undergoing an inexorable rise, the focus of psychiatric therapeutics shifted from a concern with treating the individual to maintaining the racial and biological health of national populations.[190]

Emil Kraepelin (1856–1926) introduced new medical categories of mental illness, which eventually came into psychiatric usage despite their basis in behavior rather than pathology or underlying cause. Shell shock among frontline soldiers exposed to heavy artillery bombardment was first diagnosed by British Army doctors in 1915. By 1916, similar symptoms were also noted in soldiers not exposed to explosive shocks, leading to questions as to whether the disorder was physical or psychiatric.[191] In the 1920s surrealist opposition to psychiatry was expressed in a number of surrealist publications. In the 1930s several controversial medical practices were introduced including inducing seizures (by electroshock, insulin or other drugs) or cutting parts of the brain apart (leucotomy or lobotomy). Both came into widespread use by psychiatry, but there were grave concerns and much opposition on grounds of basic morality, harmful effects, or misuse.[192]

In the 1950s new psychiatric drugs, notably the antipsychotic chlorpromazine, were designed in laboratories and slowly came into preferred use. Although often accepted as an advance in some ways, there was some opposition, due to serious adverse effects such as tardive dyskinesia. Patients often opposed psychiatry and refused or stopped taking the drugs when not subject to psychiatric control. There was also increasing opposition to the use of psychiatric hospitals, and attempts to move people back into the community on a collaborative user-led group approach (“therapeutic communities”) not controlled by psychiatry. Campaigns against masturbation were done in the Victorian era and elsewhere. Lobotomy was used until the 1970s to treat schizophrenia. This was denounced by the anti-psychiatric movement in the 1960s and later.

20th century and beyond[edit]

Twentieth-century warfare and medicine[edit]

The ABO blood group system was discovered in 1901, and the Rhesus blood group system in 1937, facilitating blood transfusion.

During the 20th century, large-scale wars were attended with medics and mobile hospital units which developed advanced techniques for healing massive injuries and controlling infections rampant in battlefield conditions. During the Mexican Revolution (1910–1920), General Pancho Villa organized hospital trains for wounded soldiers. Boxcars marked Servicio Sanitario (“sanitary service”) were re-purposed as surgical operating theaters and areas for recuperation, and staffed by up to 40 Mexican and U.S. physicians. Severely wounded soldiers were shuttled back to base hospitals.[193] Canadian physician Norman Bethune, M.D. developed a mobile blood-transfusion service for frontline operations in the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939), but ironically, he himself died of blood poisoning.[194]
Thousands of scarred troops provided the need for improved prosthetic limbs and expanded techniques in plastic surgery or reconstructive surgery. Those practices were combined to broaden cosmetic surgery and other forms of elective surgery.

During the second World War, Alexis Carrel and Henry Dakin developed the Carrel-Dakin method of treating wounds with an irrigation, Dakin’s solution, a germicide which helped prevent gangrene.[195]

The War spurred the usage of Roentgen’s X-ray, and the electrocardiograph, for the monitoring of internal bodily functions. This was followed in the inter-war period by the development of the first anti-bacterial agents such as the sulpha antibiotics.

Public health[edit]

Public health measures became particularly important during the 1918 flu pandemic, which killed at least 50 million people around the world.[196] It became an important case study in epidemiology.[197] Bristow shows there was a gendered response of health caregivers to the pandemic in the United States. Male doctors were unable to cure the patients, and they felt like failures. Women nurses also saw their patients die, but they took pride in their success in fulfilling their professional role of caring for, ministering, comforting, and easing the last hours of their patients, and helping the families of the patients cope as well.[198]

From 1917 to 1923, the American Red Cross moved into Europe with a battery of long-term child health projects. It built and operated hospitals and clinics, and organized antituberculosis and antityphus campaigns. A high priority involved child health programs such as clinics, better baby shows, playgrounds, fresh air camps, and courses for women on infant hygiene. Hundreds of U.S. doctors, nurses, and welfare professionals administered these programs, which aimed to reform the health of European youth and to reshape European public health and welfare along American lines.[199]

Second World War[edit]

American combat surgery during the Pacific War, 1943. Major wars showed the need for effective hygiene and medical treatment.

The advances in medicine made a dramatic difference for Allied troops, while the Germans and especially the Japanese and Chinese suffered from a severe lack of newer medicines, techniques and facilities. Harrison finds that the chances of recovery for a badly wounded British infantryman were as much as 25 times better than in the First World War. The reason was that:

“By 1944 most casualties were receiving treatment within hours of wounding, due to the increased mobility of field hospitals and the extensive use of aeroplanes as ambulances. The care of the sick and wounded had also been revolutionized by new medical technologies, such as active immunization against tetanus, sulphonamide drugs, and penicillin.”[200]

Nazi and Japanese medical research[edit]

Unethical human subject research, and killing of patients with disabilities, peaked during the Nazi era, with Nazi human experimentation and Aktion T4 during the Holocaust as the most significant examples. Many of the details of these and related events were the focus of the Doctors’ Trial. Subsequently, principles of medical ethics, such as the Nuremberg Code, were introduced to prevent a recurrence of such atrocities.[201] After 1937, the Japanese Army established programs of biological warfare in China. In Unit 731, Japanese doctors and research scientists conducted large numbers of vivisections and experiments on human beings, mostly Chinese victims.[202]


Starting in World War II, DDT was used as insecticide to combat insect vectors carrying malaria, which was endemic in most tropical regions of the world.[203] The first goal was to protect soldiers, but it was widely adopted as a public health device. In Liberia, for example, the United States had large military operations during the war and the U.S. Public Health Service began the use of DDT for indoor residual spraying (IRS) and as a larvicide, with the goal of controlling malaria in Monrovia, the Liberian capital. In the early 1950s, the project was expanded to nearby villages. In 1953, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched an antimalaria program in parts of Liberia as a pilot project to determine the feasibility of malaria eradication in tropical Africa. However these projects encountered a spate of difficulties that foreshadowed the general retreat from malaria eradication efforts across tropical Africa by the mid-1960s.[204]

Post-World War II[edit]

Smallpox vaccination in Niger, 1969. A decade later, this was the first infectious disease to be eradicated.

Most countries have seen a tremendous increase in life expectancy since 1945. However, in southern Africa, the HIV epidemic beginning around 1990 has eroded national health.

The World Health Organization was founded in 1948 as a United Nations agency to improve global health. In most of the world, life expectancy has improved since then, and was about 67 years as of 2010, and well above 80 years in some countries. Eradication of infectious diseases is an international effort, and several new vaccines have been developed during the post-war years, against infections such as measles, mumps, several strains of influenza and human papilloma virus. The long-known vaccine against Smallpox finally eradicated the disease in the 1970s, and Rinderpest was wiped out in 2011. Eradication of polio is underway. Tissue culture is important for development of vaccines. Though the early success of antiviral vaccines and antibacterial drugs, antiviral drugs were not introduced until the 1970s. Through the WHO, the international community has developed a response protocol against epidemics, displayed during the SARS epidemic in 2003, the Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 from 2004, the Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa and onwards.

As infectious diseases have become less lethal, and the most common causes of death in developed countries are now tumors and cardiovascular diseases, these conditions have received increased attention in medical research. Tobacco smoking as a cause of lung cancer was first researched in the 1920s, but was not widely supported by publications until the 1950s. Cancer treatment has been developed with radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgical oncology.

Oral rehydration therapy has been extensively used since the 1970s to treat cholera and other diarrhea-inducing infections.

The sexual revolution included taboo-breaking research in human sexuality such as the 1948 and 1953 Kinsey reports, invention of hormonal contraception, and the normalization of abortion and homosexuality in many countries. Family planning has promoted a demographic transition in most of the world. With threatening sexually transmitted infections, not least HIV, use of barrier contraception has become imperative. The struggle against HIV has improved antiretroviral treatments.

X-ray imaging was the first kind of medical imaging, and later ultrasonic imaging, CT scanning, MR scanning and other imaging methods became available.

Genetics have advanced with the discovery of the DNA molecule, genetic mapping and gene therapy. Stem cell research took off in the 2000s (decade), with stem cell therapy as a promising method.

Evidence-based medicine is a modern concept, not introduced to literature until the 1990s.

Prosthetics have improved. In 1958, Arne Larsson in Sweden became the first patient to depend on an artificial cardiac pacemaker. He died in 2001 at age 86, having outlived its inventor, the surgeon, and 26 pacemakers. Lightweight materials as well as neural prosthetics emerged in the end of the 20th century.

Modern surgery[edit]

Cardiac surgery was revolutionized in 1948 as open-heart surgery was introduced for the first time since 1925.

In 1954 Joseph Murray, J. Hartwell Harrison and others accomplished the first kidney transplantation. Transplantations of other organs, such as heart, liver and pancreas, were also introduced during the later 20th century. The first partial face transplant was performed in 2005, and the first full one in 2010. By the end of the 20th century, microtechnology had been used to create tiny robotic devices to assist microsurgery using micro-video and fiber-optic cameras to view internal tissues during surgery with minimally invasive practices.[205]

Laparoscopic surgery was broadly introduced in the 1990s. Natural orifice surgery has followed. Remote surgery is another recent development, with the transatlantic Lindbergh operation in 2001 as a groundbreaking example.

See also[edit]

Explanatory notes[edit]

  1. ^
    England and Wales had nine county and borough asylums in 1827 with an average capacity of a little over 100 patients, but by 1890 there were 66 such asylums containing on average 800 patients each;[207] the total number of patients so confined increased from 1,027 in 1827 to 74,004 in 1900.[208] Similarly, in Germany, between 1852 and 1898 the asylum population increased seven-fold from 11,622 to 74,087 patients during a period when the total population had only grown by ten per cent.[183] In America the asylum population had risen to almost 250,000 on the eve of the First World War.[209]


  1. ^ Spitkins, Penny; el al (22 February 2018). “Calculated or caring? Neanderthal healthcare in social context”. World Anthropology. 50 (3): 384–403. doi:10.1080/00438243.2018.1433060.
  2. ^ “Contribution of India in Medical Sciences” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-04-08. Retrieved 2018-04-07.
  3. ^ “Stone age man used dentist drill”. 6 April 2006 – via news.bbc.co.uk.
  4. ^ “Neolithic Surgery – Archaeology Magazine Archive”. archive.archaeology.org.
  5. ^ “A possible Early Neolithic amputation at Buthiers-Boulancourt (Seine-et-Marne), France”.
  6. ^ a b c d e f Black, Jeremy; Green, Anthony (1992). Gods, Demons and Symbols of Ancient Mesopotamia: An Illustrated Dictionary. The British Museum Press. p. 102. ISBN 978-0-7141-1705-8.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  7. ^ a b c d e f g McIntosh, Jane R. (2005). Ancient Mesopotamia: New Perspectives. Santa Barbara, California, Denver, Colorado, and Oxford, England: ABC-CLIO. pp. 273–76. ISBN 978-1-57607-966-9.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  8. ^ a b c d e Farber, Walter (1995). Witchcraft, Magic, and Divination in Ancient Mesopotamia. Civilizations of the Ancient Near East. 3. New York: Charles Schribner’s Sons, MacMillan Library Reference, Simon & Schuster MacMillan. pp. 1891–908. ISBN 978-0-684-19279-6. Retrieved 2018-05-12.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  9. ^ a b c Abusch, Tzvi (2002). Mesopotamian Witchcraft: Towards a History and Understanding of Babylonian Witchcraft Beliefs and Literature. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. p. 56. ISBN 978-90-04-12387-8.
  10. ^ a b c Brown, Michael (1995). Israel’s Divine Healer. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-310-20029-1.
  11. ^ R.D. Biggs (2005). “Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health in Ancient Mesopotamia”. Journal of Assyrian Academic Studies. 19 (1): 7–18.
  12. ^ Humanity, History of. “Geography – Mesopotamia”. www.ancientmesopotamia.org. Archived from the original on 2018-11-27. Retrieved 2018-12-19.
  13. ^ a b Horstmanshoff, Tilburg & Stol 2004, p. 99
  14. ^ Heeßel, N. P. (2004). “Diagnosis, Divination, and Disease: Towards an Understanding of the Rationale Behind the Babylonian Diagonostic Handbook“. In Horstmanshoff, H.F. .; Stol, Marten; Tilburg, Cornelis (eds.). Magic and Rationality in Ancient Near Eastern and Graeco-Roman Medicine. Studies in Ancient Medicine. 27. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. pp. 97–116. ISBN 978-90-04-13666-3.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  15. ^ Marten Stol, Epilepsy in Babylonia, (1993) p. 55,
  16. ^ Horstmanshoff, Tilburg & Stol 2004, pp. 97–98
  17. ^ a b c d e f Nemet-Nejat, Karen Rhea (1998). Daily Life in Ancient Mesopotamia. Daily Life. Santa Barbara, California: Greenwood. pp. 80–81. ISBN 978-0-313-29497-6.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  18. ^ Herodotus. “Chapter 77, Book II”. The Histories.
  19. ^ Nunn, John F. (2002). “Ancient Egyptian Medicine”. Transactions of the Medical Society of London. University of Oklahoma Press. 113: 57–68. PMID 10326089.
  20. ^ J.H. Breasted, The Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus, University of Chicago Press, 1930
  21. ^ “Edwin Smith papyrus – Britannica Online Encyclopedia”. Britannica.com. Retrieved 2012-04-21.
  22. ^ Griffith, F. Ll. The Petrie Papyri: Hieratic Papyri from Kahun and Gurob
  23. ^ a b c Bynum, W.F. (2006). “The Rise of Science in Medicine, 1850–1913”. The Western Medical Tradition: 1800–2000. Hardy, Anne; Jacyna, Stephen; Lawrence, Christopher; Tansey, E.M. Cambridge University Press. pp. 198–99. ISBN 978-0-521-47565-5.
  24. ^ “The Kahun Gynaecological Papyrus”. Reshafim.org.il. Retrieved 2012-04-21.
  25. ^ “Museum: House of Life”. www.ucl.ac.uk. Retrieved 2017-02-17.
  26. ^ Magner, Lois (1992). A History of Medicine. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. p. 31. ISBN 978-0-8247-8673-1.
  27. ^ Helaine Selin, Hugh Shapiro, eds., Medicine Across Cultures: History and Practice of Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, Springer 2003, p.35
  28. ^ “Female Physicians in Ancient Egypt”. Ancient History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2019-06-16.
  29. ^ Kenneth G. Zysk, Asceticism and Healing in Ancient India: Medicine in the Buddhist Monastery, Oxford University Press, rev. ed. (1998) ISBN 0-19-505956-5
  30. ^ Dominik Wujastyk, ed., The Roots of Ayurveda, Penguin (2003) ISBN 0-14-044824-1
  31. ^ Arab Medicine during the Ages by Hakim Syed Zillur Rahman, Studies in History of Medicine and Science, IHMMR, New Delhi, Vol. XIV, No. 1-2, 1996, p. 1–39
  32. ^ Deepak Kumar, “India” in Roy Porter, ed, The Cambridge History of Science: Volume 4: 18th-century Science (2003) pp. 680–83
  33. ^ Unschuld (2003), 1.
  34. ^ Frank Dikotter, “China” in Roy Porter, ed, The Cambridge History of Science: Volume 4: 18th-century Science (2003) pp. 695–97
  35. ^ TJ Hinrichs; Linda L Barnes; et al. (2012). Chinese Medicine and Healing: An Illustrated History. Harvard University Press. p. 197. ISBN 978-0-674-04737-2.
  36. ^ Edward T. James; et al., eds. (1971). Notable American Women, 1607–1950: A Biographical Dictionary. Harvard U.P. pp. 685–86 vol 2. ISBN 978-0-674-62734-5.
  37. ^ Furth, Charlotte (1999). A Flourishing Yin: Gender in China’s Medical History, 960-1665. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 19.
  38. ^ Furth, Charlotte (1999). A Flourishing Yin: Gender in China’s Medical History, 960-1665. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 19–20.
  39. ^ Furth, Charlotte (1999). A Flourishing Yin: Gender in China’s Medical History, 960-1665. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 19–20.
  40. ^ Furth, Charlotte (1999). A Flourishing Yin: Gender in China’s Medical History, 960-1665. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 20.
  41. ^ Furth, Charlotte (1999). A Flourishing Yin: Gender in China’s Medical History, 960-1665. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 21.
  42. ^ Furth, Charlotte (1999). A Flourishing Yin: Gender in China’s Medical History, 960-1665. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 225.
  43. ^ Furth, Charlotte (1999). A Flourishing Yin: Gender in China’s Medical History, 960-1665. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 226–227.
  44. ^ Furth, Charlotte (1999). A Flourishing Yin: Gender in China’s Medical History, 960-1665. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 225.
  45. ^ Furth, Charlotte (1999). A Flourishing Yin: Gender in China’s Medical History, 960-1665. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 226–227.
  46. ^ Homer. Iliad. p. Bk XI:804–48.
  47. ^ a b Risse, G.B. (1990). Mending bodies, saving souls: a history of hospitals. Oxford University Press. p. 56. ISBN 978-0-19-974869-3.
  48. ^ a b Askitopoulou, H.; Konsolaki, E.; Ramoutsaki, I.; Anastassaki, E. (2002). Surgical cures by sleep induction as the Asclepieion of Epidaurus. The history of anesthesia: proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium, by José Carlos Diz, Avelino Franco, Douglas R. Bacon, J. Rupreht, Julián Alvarez. Elsevier Science B.V., International Congress Series 1242. pp. 11–17. ISBN 978-0-444-51293-2.
  49. ^ “Alcmaeon”. Stanford University. 10 June 2013. Retrieved 30 December 2015.
  50. ^ “medicinaantiqua.org.uk”. www.medicinaantiqua.org.uk.
  51. ^ “The Father of Modern Medicine: Hippocrates”. 2008-02-28. Archived from the original on 2008-02-28. Retrieved 2012-04-21.
  52. ^ Porter, Roy (1998) [1997]. The greatest benefit to mankind : a medical history of humanity 1946–2002 (1st American ed.). New York: W.W. Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-04634-2. OCLC 38410525.
  53. ^ “What is finger clubbing?”. Cancer Research UK. Retrieved 30 December 2015.
  54. ^ Shakespeare, William. Henry V. p. Act II, Scene 3.
  55. ^ Silverberg, Robert (1967). The dawn of medicine. Putnam. Retrieved 16 January 2013.
  56. ^ Loudon, Irvine (2002-03-07). Western Medicine: An Illustrated History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-924813-1. Retrieved 16 January 2013.
  57. ^ Nutton, Vivian (2012). Ancient Medicine. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-52094-2. Retrieved 16 January 2013.
  58. ^ Day, Cyrus L. (1967). Quipus and Witches’ Knots. Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Press. pp. 86–89, 124–26.
  59. ^ Longrigg, James (1993). Greek Rational Medicine: Philosophy and Medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-415-02594-2. Retrieved 16 January 2013.
  60. ^ Galen, On the Natural Faculties, Books I, II, and III, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard, 2000
  61. ^ Mason, A History of the Sciences, p. 57
  62. ^ Susan P. Mattern (2013). The Prince of Medicine: Galen in the Roman Empire. ISBN 978-0-19-998615-6.
  63. ^ Rudolph E. Siegel, Galen’s system of physiology and medicine (Karger, 1973).
  64. ^ Faith Wallis (2010). Medieval Medicine: A Reader. pp. 14, 26, 222. ISBN 978-1-4426-0103-1.
  65. ^ a b Numbers, Ronald (2009). Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths About Science and Religion. Harvard University Press. p. 45. ISBN 978-0-674-03327-6.
  66. ^ a b “Debunking a myth”. 7 April 2011.
  67. ^ Peter Dear, Revolutionizing the Sciences: European Knowledge and Its Ambitions, 1500–1700. (2001), 37–39.
  68. ^ “Surgical Instruments from Ancient Rome”. Healthsystem.virginia.edu. Archived from the original on 2008-01-31. Retrieved 2012-04-21.
  69. ^ “Roman period surgery set on show”. BBC.
  70. ^ William Alexander Greenhill, Chirurgia
  71. ^ “The Romans carried out cataract ops”. 9 February 2008 – via news.bbc.co.uk.
  72. ^ “Greek Medicine”. US National Institutes of Health. 16 September 2002. Retrieved 29 August 2014.
  73. ^ “Project MUSE – Journal of Late Antiquity-Volume 8, Number 2, Fall 2015”. muse.jhu.edu. Retrieved 2020-01-12.
  74. ^ “The Case of Conjoined Twins in 10th Century Byzantium”. Medievalists.net. 4 January 2014.
  75. ^ http://denysmontandon.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/conjoined-twins.pdf
  76. ^ Cambridge History of Iran Volume 4. Cambridge University Press. 1968. p. 396. ISBN 978-0-521-20093-6.
  77. ^ Cyril, Elgood (1951). A medical history of Persia. Cambridge University Press. p. 173.
  78. ^ Medieval Islamic Civilization: An Encyclopedia, by Josef W. Meri, Jere L. Bacharach p.783
  79. ^ George Sarton, Introduction to the History of Science.
    (cf. Dr. A. Zahoor and Dr. Z. Haq (1997), Quotations From Famous Historians of Science, Cyberistan.
  80. ^ kill or cure An Illustrated History of Medicine
    (cf. Steve Parker (2013)
  81. ^
    Becka J (1980). “The father of medicine, Avicenna, in our science and culture: Abu Ali ibn Sina (980–1037) (Czech title: Otec lékarů Avicenna v nasí vĕdĕ a kulture)”. Cas Lek Cesk (in Czech). 119 (1): 17–23. PMID 6989499.
  82. ^ “Avicenna 980–1037”. Hcs.osu.edu. Archived from the original on October 7, 2008. Retrieved 2010-01-19.
  83. ^ The Canon of Medicine” (work by Avicenna)”. Encyclopædia Britannica. 2008. Archived from the original on 28 May 2008. Retrieved 11 Jun 2008.
  84. ^ “Encyclopedia Iranica; Avicenna: Medicine and Biology”. Retrieved 20 December 2013.
  85. ^ Tschanz, David W. (2003). “Arab(?) Roots of European Medicine”. Heart Views. 4 (2). Archived from the original on 2004-05-03. Retrieved 2019-03-04.copy Archived 30 November 2004 at the Wayback Machine
  86. ^ On the dominance of the Greek humoral theory, which was the basis for the practice of bloodletting, in medieval Islamic medicine Pormann, Peter E.; Smith, E. Savage (2007). Medieval Islamic medicine. Washington DC: Georgetown University. pp. 10, 43–45. OL 12911905W.
  87. ^ Iskandar, Albert (2006). “Al-Rāzī”. Encyclopaedia of the history of science, technology, and medicine in non-western cultures (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 155–156.
  88. ^ Ganchy, Sally. Islam and Science, Medicine, and Technology. New York: Rosen Pub., 2008.
  89. ^ Tschanz David W., PhD (2003). “Arab(?) Roots of European Medicine”. Heart Views. 4 (2).
  90. ^ a b Elgood, Cyril (2010). A Medical History of Persia and The Eastern Caliphate (1st ed.). London: Cambridge. pp. 202–203. ISBN 978-1-108-01588-2. By writing a monograph on ‘Diseases in Children’ he may also be looked upon as the father of paediatrics.
  91. ^ Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind. A medical history of humanity (1997) pp. 106–34
  92. ^ William D. Sharpe, “Isidore of Seville: The Medical Writings, An English Translation with an Introduction and Commentary” (1964).
  93. ^ Rosamond McKitterick, “The Carolingian Renaissance of Culture and Learning” in “Charlemagne: Empire and Society” (2005).»
  94. ^ Faith Wallis, Medieval Medicine: A Reader (2010) p. 361
  95. ^ Vecchio Ignazio; Tornali Cristina; Rampello L; Migliore M; Rigo G.S., Armocida G. Jewish medicine and surgery in Catania, Italy before 1492. pp. 359–62. In Acta Medica Mediterranea. ISSN 0393-6384 vol. 29 (3):2013 University of Catania and University of Insubria.
  96. ^ Vecchio Ignazio, Di Mauro S., Tornali Cristina, Rampello L., Migliore M., 2012. Jewish Medicine and Surgery in Sicily Before 1492. pp. 77–82. In Acta Medica Mediterranea. ISSN 0393-6384 vol. 28 .
  97. ^ Nicola Barber (2012). Medieval Medicine. Heinemann-Raintree Library. p. 13. ISBN 978-1-4109-4661-4.
  98. ^ Barbara S. Bowers, ed. The Medieval Hospital and Medical Practice (2007) p. 89
  99. ^ ) Emily Taitz, Sondra Henry, Cheryl Tallan, The JPS guide to Jewish Women 600 B.C.E – 1900 C.E., Philadelphia, The Jewish Publication Society, 2003
  100. ^ Siraisi, Nancy G. (2012). “Medicine, 1450–1620, and the History of Science”. Isis. 103 (3): 491–514. doi:10.1086/667970. PMID 23286188.
  101. ^ Michael Servetus Research Archived 2012-11-13 at the Wayback Machine Website with a graphical study on the Manuscript of Paris by Servetus
  102. ^ a b Madigan M, Martinko J, eds. (2006). Brock Biology of Microorganisms (11th ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-144329-7.
  103. ^ Webster, Charles (1995). “Paracelsus Confronts the Saints: Miracles, Healing and the Secularization of Magic”. Social History of Medicine. 8 (3): 403–21. doi:10.1093/shm/8.3.403. PMID 11609052.
  104. ^ Charles Webster, Paracelsus: Medicine, Magic, and Mission at the End of Time (Yale Univ. Press, 2008)
  105. ^ Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind (1997), 201–11
  106. ^ Robert Krieger (2001). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Academic Press. pp. xxvii–xxviii.
  107. ^ Jerome J. Bylebyl, “The School of Padua: humanistic medicine in the 16th century,” in Charles Webster, ed., Health, Medicine and Mortality in the Sixteenth Century (1979) ch10
  108. ^ Lo Presti, Roberto (2010). “Anatomy as Epistemology: The Body of Man and the Body of Medicine in Vesalius and his Ancient Sources (Celsus, Galen)”. Renaissance and Reformation/Renaissance et Reforme. 33 (3): 27–60.
  109. ^ Nancy G. Siraisi, Medieval and Early Renaissance Medicine: An Introduction to Knowledge and Practice (1990) p. 21
  110. ^ Lines, David A. (2012). “Reorganizing the Curriculum: Teaching and Learning in the University of Bologna, c. 1560–1590”. History of Universities. 25 (2): 1–59.
  111. ^ Gurunluoglu, Raffi; et al. (2011). “Giulio Cesare Aranzio (Arantius) (1530–89) in the pageant of anatomy and surgery”. Journal of Medical Biography. 19 (2): 63–69. doi:10.1258/jmb.2010.010049. PMID 21558532.
  112. ^ Fissell, Mary E. (2008). “Introduction: Women, Health, and Healing in Early Modern Europe”. Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 82 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1353/bhm.2008.0024. PMID 18344583.
  113. ^ Monica Green, “Women’s Medical Practice and Health Care in Medieval Europe,” in Sisters and Workers in the Middle Ages, ed. J.M. Bennett et al. (University of Chicago Press, 1989), pp. 39–78
  114. ^ C. Scott Dixon; et al. (2009). Living With Religious Diversity in Early-Modern Europe. Ashgate. pp. 128–30. ISBN 978-0-7546-6668-4.
  115. ^ Amy E. Leonard, “Female Religious Orders,” in R. Po-chia Hsia, ed., A Companion to the Reformation World (2004) pp. 237–54
  116. ^ Andrew Cunningham; Ole Peter Grell (2002). Health Care and Poor Relief in Protestant Europe 1500–1700. Routledge. pp. 130–33. ISBN 978-0-203-43134-4.
  117. ^ Virpi Mäkinen (2006). Lutheran Reformation And the Law. Brill. pp. 227–29. ISBN 978-90-04-14904-5.
  118. ^ Keir Waddington (2003). Medical Education at St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, 1123–1995. Boydell & Brewer. p. 18. ISBN 978-0-85115-919-5.
  119. ^ Harkness, Deborah E. (2008). “A View from the Streets: Women and Medical Work in Elizabethan London”. Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 82 (1): 52–85. doi:10.1353/bhm.2008.0001. PMID 18344585.
  120. ^ Tim McHugh, “Expanding Women’s Rural Medical Work in Early Modern Brittany: The Daughters of the Holy Spirit,” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences (2012) 67#3 pp. 428–56. in project MJUSE
  121. ^ Thomas H. Broman, “The Medical Sciences,” in Roy Porter, ed, The Cambridge History of Science: Volume 4: 18th-century Science (2003) pp. 465–68
  122. ^ Lisa Rosner, Medical Education in the Age of Improvement: Edinburgh Students and Apprentices 1760–1826 (1991)
  123. ^ Margaret Pelling and Charles Webster, “Medical Practitioners,” in Webster, ed., Health, Medicine, and Mortality in the Sixteenth Century (1979), p. 183.
  124. ^ Michael Marks Davis; Andrew Robert Warner (1918). Dispensaries, Their Management and Development: A Book for Administrators, Public Health Workers, and All Interested in Better Medical Service for the People. MacMillan. pp. 2–5.
  125. ^ Kirkup, John (1996). “Samuel Sharp and the ‘Operations Of Surgery,’ 1739”. Journal of Medical Biography. 4 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1177/096777209600400101. PMID 11615341.
  126. ^ Waddington, Ivan (1975). “The Development of Medical Ethics – A Sociological Analysis”. Medical History. 19 (1): 36–51. doi:10.1017/s002572730001992x. PMC 1081608. PMID 1095851.[permanent dead link]
  127. ^ Ida Altman, Sarah Cline, and Javier Pescador, The Early History of Greater Mexico. Prentice Hall 2003, 99.
  128. ^ Cook, Sherburne F. (1946). “The Incidence of Disease Among the Aztecs and Related Tribes”. Hispanic American Historical Review. 36: 32–35.
  129. ^ Noble David Cook, Born to Die: Disease and New World Conquest, 1492–1650. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998.
  130. ^ Gordon Schendel, Medicine in Mexico: From Aztec Herbs to Betatrons. Austin: University of Texas Press 1968, p. 99.
  131. ^ John Tate Lanning, The Royal Protomedicato: The Regulation of Medical Professions in the Spanish Empire, ed. John Jay TePaske. Durham: Duke University Press 1985.
  132. ^ Michael E. Burke, The Royal College of San Carlos [Madrid]: Surgery and Spanish Medical Reform in the Late Eighteenth Century. Durham: Duke University Press 1977.
  133. ^ Donald Cooper, Epidemic Disease in Mexico City, 1761–1813: An Administrative, Social, and Medical History. Austin: University of Texas Press 1965.
  134. ^ Pamela Voekel, Alone Before God: The Religious Origins of Modernity in Mexico, especially Chapter 7, “The Rise of Medical Empiricism.” Durham: Duke University Press 2002.
  135. ^ a b c d De Vos, Paula (2006). “The Science of Spices: Empiricism and Economic Botany in the Early Spanish Empire”. Journal of World History. 17 (4): 399–427. doi:10.1353/jwh.2006.0054. ISSN 1045-6007. JSTOR 20079398.
  136. ^ a b Frank, Andre Gunder (1998). ReOrient : global economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 96–100. ISBN 9780520921313. OCLC 42922426.
  137. ^ “Historia general de las cosas de Nueva España por el fray Bernardino de Sahagún: el Códice Florentino — Visor — Biblioteca Digital Mundial”. www.wdl.org. Retrieved 2020-02-01.
  138. ^ Mary Fissell, “The Disappearance of the Patient’s Narrative and the Invention of Hospital Medicine,” in British Medicine in an Age of Reform ed. by Roger French and Andrew Wear, (1991).
  139. ^ Guenter B. Risse, Mending Bodies, Saving Souls: A History of Hospitals (1999)
  140. ^ “The Global Public–Private Partnership for Handwashing”. globalhandwashing.org. Retrieved 2015-04-18.
  141. ^ a b c d e Guénel, Annick (Jan 1999). “The creation of the first overseas Pasteur Institute, or the beginning of Albert Calmette’s Pastorian career”. Medical History. 43 (1): 1–25 [1–2]. doi:10.1017/s0025727300064693. PMC 1044108. PMID 10885131.
  142. ^ a b c Morabia, A. (2007). “Epidemiologic Interactions, Complexity, and the Lonesome Death of Max von Pettenkofer”. American Journal of Epidemiology. 166 (11): 1233–38. doi:10.1093/aje/kwm279. PMID 17934200.Oppenheimer, G.M.; Susser, E. (2007). “Invited Commentary: The Context and Challenge of von Pettenkofer’s Contributions to Epidemiology”. American Journal of Epidemiology. 166 (11): 1239–41, discussion 1241–43. doi:10.1093/aje/kwm284. PMID 17934199.
  143. ^ Blevins, S.M.; Bronze, M.S. (2010). “Robert Koch and the ‘golden age’ of bacteriology”. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 14 (9): e744–51. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2009.12.003. PMID 20413340.
  144. ^ Monica F. Baly; Social Change (2002). Nursing. Routledge. p. 113. ISBN 978-0-203-42487-2.
  145. ^ M. Patricia Donahue, Nursing, The Finest Art: An Illustrated History (3rd ed. 2010) pp. 112–25
  146. ^ Ellen Doona, Mary (1996). “Linda Richards and Nursing in Japan, 1885–1890”. Nursing History Review. 4: 99–128. doi:10.1891/1062-8061.4.1.99. PMID 7581285.
  147. ^ Henry Walter Morton (1984). The Contemporary Soviet City. M.E. Sharpe. pp. 142–45. ISBN 978-0-87332-248-5.
  148. ^ Markell Morantz, Regina (1982). “Feminism, Professionalism and Germs: The Thought of Mary Putnam Jacobi and Elizabeth Blackwell”. American Quarterly. 34 (5): 461–78. JSTOR 2712640.
  149. ^ Riane Eisler (2007). The Real Wealth of Nations: Creating a Caring Economics. p. 78.
  150. ^ Weiner, Dora B.; Sauter, Michael J. (2003). “The City of Paris and the Rise of Clinical Medicine”. Osiris. 18 (1): 23–42. doi:10.1086/649375. PMID 12964569.
  151. ^ Moira Davison Reynolds, How Pasteur Changed History: The Story of Louis Pasteur and the Pasteur Institute (1994)
  152. ^ a b Paul Weindling, “Scientific elites and laboratory organization in fin de siècle Paris and Berlin: The Pasteur Institute and Robert Koch’s Institute for Infectious Diseases compared,” in Andrew Cunningham and Perry Williams, eds. The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine (Cambridge University Press, 1992) pp. 170–88.
  153. ^ Paula Sutter Fichtner (2009). Historical Dictionary of Austria. Scarecrow Press. pp. 326–27. ISBN 978-0-8108-6310-1.
  154. ^ Nelly Tsouyopoulos, “The Influence of John Brown’s Ideas in Germany” Medical History (1988). Supplement no. 8: pp. 63–74 online.
  155. ^ Erna Lesky, The Vienna Medical School of the 19th Century (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976)
  156. ^ George Worthington Adams, Doctors in Blue: The Medical History of the Union Army in the Civil War (1996), excerpt and text search; Glenna R. Schroeder-Lein, The Encyclopedia of Civil War Medicine (2012) excerpt and text search.
  157. ^ H.H. Cunningham, Doctors in Gray: The Confederate Medical Service (1993) excerpt and text search
  158. ^ John Keegan (17 Sep 2009). “The American Civil War: the gruesome suffering of soldiers exposed”. Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 4 March 2017.
  159. ^ Link, Kenneth (1983). “Potomac Fever: The Hazards of Camp Life”. Vermont History. 51 (2): 69–88. PMID 11633534.
  160. ^ Mary C. Gillett, The Army Medical Department, 1818–1865 (1987)
  161. ^ William Quentin Maxwell, Lincoln’s Fifth Wheel: The Political History of the U.S. Sanitary Commission (1956)
  162. ^ Justin Martin, Genius of Place: The Life of Frederick Law Olmsted (2011) pp. 178–230
  163. ^ Magnello, M. Eileen (2012). “Victorian statistical graphics and the iconography of Florence Nightingale’s polar area graph”. BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics. 27 (1): 13–37. doi:10.1080/17498430.2012.618102.
  164. ^ Gunn, S. William A.; Masellis, Michele (23 October 2007). Concepts and Practice of Humanitarian Medicine. Springer. pp. 87–. ISBN 978-0-387-72264-1.
  165. ^ http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/snow/Snow_Laura_Ball.pdf
  166. ^ Brian S. Everitt; Christopher Palmer (2011). Encyclopaedic Companion to Medical Statistics. Wiley. pp. 447–48. ISBN 978-1-119-95740-9.
  167. ^ He also built the New York Public Library
  168. ^ Cassedy, James H. (1992). “Numbering the North’s Medical Events: Humanitarianism and Science in Civil War Statistics”. Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 66 (2): 210–33. PMID 1290489.
  169. ^ van der Weiden, R.M.F.; Uhlenbeck, G.C. (2010). “European 18th-century obstetrical pioneers in Japan: a new light in the Empire of the Sun”. Journal of Medical Biography. 18 (2): 99–101. doi:10.1258/jmb.2010.010006. PMID 20519709.
  170. ^ Ciriacono, Salvatore (2010). “Scientific Transfer between Europe and Japan: The Influence of Dutch and German Medicine from the Edo Period to the Meiji Restoration”. Comparativ: Leipziger Beiträge zur Universalgeschichte und Vergleichenden Gesellschaftsforschung. 20 (6): 134–53.
  171. ^ Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox, Medical Knowledge and the “Opening” of Japan (2007)
  172. ^ Joseph Patrick Byrne; Plagues (2008). Encyclopedia of Pestilence, Pandemics. ABC-CLIO. p. 339.
  173. ^ Derek S. Linton (2005). Emil Von Behring: Infectious Disease, Immunology, Serum Therapy. American Philosophical Society. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-87169-255-9.
  174. ^ Donzé, Pierre-Yves (2010). “Making medicine a business in Japan: Shimadzu Co. and the diffusion of radiology (1900–1960)”. Gesnerus. 67 (2): 241–62. PMID 21417169.
  175. ^ Lynteris, Christos (2011). “From Prussia to China: Japanese Colonial Medicine and Got o Shinpei’s Combination of Medical Police and Local Self-Administration”. Medical History. 55 (3): 343–47. doi:10.1017/s0025727300005378. PMC 3143861. PMID 21792258.
  176. ^ Michael Shiyung Liu, Prescribing Colonization: The Role of Medical Practices and Policies in Japan-Ruled Taiwan, 1895–1945 (Ann Arbor: Association for Asian Studies, 2009) 286 pp.
  177. ^ Porter, Roy (1999). The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity from Antiquity to the Present. London: Fontana. p. 493. ISBN 978-0-393-31980-4.; Porter, Roy (1992). “Madness and its Institutions”. In Wear, Andrew (ed.). Medicine in Society: Historical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 277–302. ISBN 978-0-521-33639-0.; Suzuki, A. (1991). “Lunacy in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century England: Analysis of Quarter Sessions records Part I”. History of Psychiatry. 2 (8): 437–56. doi:10.1177/0957154X9100200807. PMID 11612606.; Suzuki, A. (1992). “Lunacy in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century England: Analysis of Quarter Sessions records Part II”. History of Psychiatry. 3 (9): 29–44. doi:10.1177/0957154X9200300903. PMID 11612665.
  178. ^ Porter, Roy (1992). “Madness and its Institutions”. In Wear, Andrew (ed.). Medicine in Society: Historical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 277–302. ISBN 978-0-521-33639-0.; Goldstein, Jan (2001) [1987]. Console and Classify: The French Psychiatric Profession in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-226-30160-0.; Grob, Gerald N. (1994). Mad Among Us. Simon and Schuster. pp. 25–30. ISBN 978-1-4391-0571-9.
  179. ^ Porter, Roy (2004). Madmen: a social history of madhouses, mad-doctors & lunatics. Tempus. pp. 57–76, 239–44, 257–312. ISBN 978-0-7524-3730-9.; Hayward, Rhodri (2011). “Medicine and the Mind”. In Jackson, Mark (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Medicine. Oxford University Press. pp. 524–42. ISBN 978-0-19-954649-7.
  180. ^ Bynum, W.F. (1974). “Rationales for therapy in British psychiatry: 1780–1835”. Medical History. 18 (4): 317–34. doi:10.1017/s0025727300019761. PMC 1081592. PMID 4618306.; Digby, Anne (1988). “Moral Treatment at the Retreat 1796–1846”. In Porter, Roy; Bynum, W.F.; Shepherd, Michael (eds.). The Anatomy of Madness: Essays in the History of Psychiatry. 2. London & New York: Tavistock. pp. 52–71. ISBN 978-0-415-00859-4.
  181. ^ Weiner, Dora B. (1994). “ ‘La geste du Pinel’: The History of a Psychiatric Myth”. In Micale, Mark S.; Porter Roy (eds.). Discovering the History of Psychiatry. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 232–47. ISBN 978-0-19-507739-1.
  182. ^ Porter, Roy (1992). “Madness and its Institutions”. In Wear, Andrew (ed.). Medicine in Society: Historical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 277–302. ISBN 978-0-521-33639-0.
  183. ^ a b Marx, Otto M. (1994). “The Beginning of Psychiatric Historiography in Nineteenth-Century Germany”. In Micale, Mark S.; Porter Roy (eds.). Discovering the History of Psychiatry. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 39–51. ISBN 978-0-19-507739-1.
  184. ^ a b Hayward, Rhodri (2011). “Medicine and the Mind”. In Jackson, Mark (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Medicine. Oxford University Press. pp. 524–42. ISBN 978-0-19-954649-7.
  185. ^ Andrews, Jonathan (2004). “The Rise of the Asylum in Britain”. In Brunton, Deborah (ed.). Medicine Transformed: Health, Disease and Society in Europe 1800–1930. Manchester University Press. pp. 298–330. ISBN 978-0-7190-6735-8.; Porter, Roy (2003). “Introduction”. In Porter, Roy; Wright, David (eds.). The Confinement of the Insane: International Perspectives, 1800–1965. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–19. ISBN 978-1-139-43962-6.
  186. ^ Cooter, R.J. (1976). “Phrenology and British alienists, c. 1825–1845. Part I: Converts to a doctrine”. Medical History. 20 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1017/s0025727300021761. PMC 1081688. PMID 765647.; Cooter, R.J. (1976). “Phrenology and British alienists, c. 1825–1845. Part II: Doctrine and practice”. Medical History. 20 (2): 135–51. doi:10.1017/s0025727300022195. PMC 1081733. PMID 781421.
  187. ^ Shorter, Edward (1997). A history of psychiatry: from the era of the asylum to the age of Prozac. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 46–48. ISBN 978-0-471-15749-6.; Bynum, W.F. (2006). “The Rise of Science in Medicine, 1850–1913”. The Western Medical Tradition: 1800–2000. Hardy, Anne; Jacyna, Stephen; Lawrence, Christopher; Tansey, E.M. Cambridge University Press. pp. 198–99. ISBN 978-0-521-47565-5.
  188. ^ Pick, Daniel (1993). Faces of Degeneration: A European Disorder, c. 1848–1918. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-45753-8.
  189. ^ Ray, L.J. (1981). “Models of madness in Victorian asylum practice”. European Journal of Sociology. 22 (2): 229–64. doi:10.1017/S0003975600003714. PMID 11630885.; Cox, Catherine (2012). Negotiating Insanity in the Southeast of Ireland, 1820–1900. Manchester University Press. pp. 54–55. ISBN 978-0-7190-7503-2.; Malcolm, Elizabeth (2003). “Ireland’s Crowded Madhouses’: The Institutional Confinement of the Insane in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Ireland”. In Porter, Roy; Wright, David (eds.). The Confinement of the Insane: International Perspectives, 1800–1965. Cambridge University Press. pp. 315–33. ISBN 978-1-139-43962-6.
  190. ^ Hayward, Rhodri (2011). “Medicine and the Mind”. In Jackson, Mark (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Medicine. Oxford University Press. pp. 524–42. ISBN 978-0-19-954649-7.; Scull, Andrew (2005). Most Solitary of Afflictions: Madness And Society in Britain, 1700–1900. Yale University Press. pp. 324–28. ISBN 978-0-300-10754-8.; Dowbiggin, I. (1992). “An exodus of enthusiasm”: G. Alder Blumer, eugenics, and US psychiatry, 1890–1920″. Medical History. 36 (4): 379–402. doi:10.1017/S002572730005568X. PMC 1036631. PMID 1435019.; Snelders, S.; Meijman, F.J.; Pieters, T. (2007). “Heredity and alcoholism in the medical sphere: The Netherlands, 1850–1900”. Medical History. 51 (2): 219–36. doi:10.1017/S0025727300001204. PMC 1871693. PMID 17538696.; Turda, M. (2009). “To end the degeneration of a nation”: Debates on eugenic sterilization in inter-war Romania”. Medical History. 53 (1): 77–104. doi:10.1017/S002572730000332X. PMC 2629178. PMID 19190750.
  191. ^ Alexander, Caroline (2010). “The Shock of War”. Smithsonian. 41 (5): 58–66.
  192. ^ G. E. Berrios and Roy Porter The History of Clinical Psychiatry (1995)
  193. ^ Friedrich Katz, The Life and Times of Pancho Villa. Stanford: Stanford University Press 1998, 292.
  194. ^ “Henry Norman Bethune Biography”. Encyclopedia of World Biography. Thomson Corporation.
  195. ^ Mark Harrison, The Medical War: British Military Medicine in the First World War (2010) excerpt and text search
  196. ^ John M. Barry, The Great Influenza: The Story of the Deadliest Pandemic in History (2004) reviews, excerpt and text search
  197. ^ Fred R. Van Hartesveldt, “The Doctors and the ‘Flu’: The British Medical Profession’s Response to the Influenza Pandemic of 1918–19,” International Social Science Review (2010) 85#1 pp. 28–39, online
  198. ^ Nancy K. Bristow, American Pandemic: The Lost Worlds of the 1918 Influenza Epidemic (Oxford University Press, 2012)
  199. ^ Julia F. Irwin, “Sauvons les Bébés: Child Health and U.S. Humanitarian Aid in the First World War Era,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine (2012) 86#1 pp. 37–65. in Project MUSE; John F. Hutchinson, Champions of Charity: War and the Rise of the Red Cross (1996), pp. 224–77
  200. ^ Mark Harrison, Medicine and Victory: British Military Medicine in the Second World War (2004) p. 275
  201. ^ Horst H. Freyhofer, The Nuremberg Medical Trial: The Holocaust and the Origin of the Nuremberg Medical Code (2004) online
  202. ^ Jing Bao Nie, et al. Japan’s Wartime Medical Atrocities: Comparative Inquiries in Science, History, and Ethics (2011) excerpt and text search
  203. ^ James L.A. Webb Jr., Humanity’s Burden: A Global History of Malaria (2009); Randall M. Packard, The Making of a Tropical Disease: A Short History of Malaria (2007); Leo B. Slater, War and Disease: Biomedical Research on Malaria in the Twentieth Century (2009).
  204. ^ James L.A. Webb, “The First Large-Scale Use of Synthetic Insecticide for Malaria Control in Tropical Africa: Lessons from Liberia, 1945–1962,” Journal of the History of Medicine & Allied Sciences (2011) 66#3 pp. 347–76 in Project MUSE
  205. ^ Murray, Joseph E., “The First Successful Organ Transplants in Man”, Nobel Lect., 1990, Nobelprize.org., Web, July 7, 2010
  206. ^ Allbutt, Thomas Clifford (1911). “Medicine: Modern Progress” . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 18 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 55–64.;
  207. ^ Scull, Andrew (2005). Most Solitary of Afflictions: Madness And Society in Britain, 1700–1900. Yale University Press. p. 281. ISBN 978-0-300-10754-8.
  208. ^ Jones, Kathleen (1993). Asylums and after: a revised history of the mental health services: from the early 18th century to the 1990s. Athlone Press. p. 116. ISBN 978-0-485-12091-2.
  209. ^ Wright, D. (1997). “Getting Out of the Asylum: Understanding the Confinement of the Insane in the Nineteenth Century”. Social History of Medicine. 10 (1): 137–55. doi:10.1093/shm/10.1.137. PMID 11619188.

Further reading[edit]

  • Bowers, Barbara S. ed. The Medieval Hospital and Medical Practice (Ashgate, 2007); 258 pp; essays by scholars
  • Breslaw, Elaine G. (2014). Lotions, Potions, Pills, and Magic: Health Care in Early America. ISBN 978-1-4798-0704-8.
  • Brockliss, Laurence and Colin Jones. The Medical World of Early Modern France (1997). 984 pp; detailed survey, 1600–1790s excerpt and text search
  • Burnham, John C. Health Care in America: A History (2015), Comprehensive scholarly history
  • Bynum, W.F. and Roy Porter, eds. Companion Encyclopedia of the History of Medicine (2 vol. 1997); 1840 pp; 36 essays by scholars excerpt and text search
  • Bynum, W.F. et al. The Western Medical Tradition: 1800–2000 (2006) 610 pp; 4 essays excerpt and text search
  • Conrad, Lawrence I. et al. The Western Medical Tradition: 800 BC to AD 1800 (1995); excerpt and text search
  • Cooter, Roger; Pickstone, John V., eds. (2003). Companion to Medicine in the 20th Century. Taylor & Francis. 756pp. ISBN 978-0-415-28603-9.
  • Donahue, M. Patricia. Nursing, The Finest Art: An Illustrated History (3r ed. 2010) excerpt and text search
  • Horstmanshoff, H.F.J.; Tilburg, CR Van; Stol, M (2004). Magic and Rationality in Ancient Near Eastern and Graeco-Roman Medicine. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-13666-3.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Jackson, Mark, ed. (2011). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Medicine. Oxford University Press. 672pp. ISBN 978-0-19-954649-7.
  • Loudon, Irvine, ed. Western Medicine: An Illustrated History (1997) online
  • Majno, Guido (1991). The Healing Hand: Man and Wound in the Ancient World. ISBN 978-0-674-38331-9.
  • McGrew, Roderick. Encyclopedia of Medical History (1985)
  • Porter, Roy (1997). The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity from Antiquity to the Present. Harper Collins. ISBN 978-0-393-31980-4.
  • Nutton, Vivian. Ancient Medicine (2004) 489 pp. online
  • Porter, Roy, ed. The Cambridge Illustrated History of Medicine (2001) excerpt and text search
    • Porter, Roy, ed. The Cambridge History of Medicine (2006); 416 pp; excerpt and text search same text without the illustrations
  • Porter, Roy. Blood and Guts: A Short History of Medicine (2004) 224 pp; excerpt and text search
  • Rosenberg, Charles Ernest, ed. (1992). Framing Disease: Studies in Cultural History. Rutgers University Press. 326pp. ISBN 978-0-8135-1757-5.
  • Rousseau Rousseau, George S., ed. (2003). Framing and Imagining Disease in Cultural History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-4039-1292-3. With Miranda Gill, David Haycock and Malte Herwig.
  • Singer, Charles, and E. Ashworth Underwood. A Short History of Medicine (2nd ed. 1962)
  • Siraisi, Nancy G (2012). “Medicine, 1450–1620, and the History of Science”. Isis. 103 (3): 491–514. doi:10.1086/667970. PMID 23286188.
  • Siraisi, Nancy G. Medieval and Early Renaissance Medicine: An Introduction to Knowledge and Practice (1990) excerpt and text search
  • Watts, Sheldon. Disease and Medicine in World History (2003), 166 pp. online
  • Wear, Andrew, ed. (1992). Medicine in Society: Historical Essays. Cambridge University Press. 397pp. ISBN 978-0-521-33639-0.
  • Weatherall, Miles. In Search of a Cure: A History of Pharmaceutical Discovery (1990), emphasis on antibiotics.


  • Bonner, Thomas Neville. Becoming a Physician: Medical Education in Britain, France, Germany, and the United States, 1750–1945 (Johns Hopkins U.P. 2000) excerpt and text search
  • Bonner, Thomas Neville. To the Ends of the Earth: Women’s Search for Education in Medicine (Harvard U.P., 1992)
  • More, Ellen S. Restoring the Balance: Women Physicians and the Profession of Medicine, 1850–1995 (Harvard U.P. 1999), focus on U.S. online


  • Berridge, Virginia. “Health and Medicine” in F M.L. Thompson, ed., The Cambridge Social History of Britain, 1750–1950, vol. 3, Social Agencies and Institutions, (1990). pp. 171–242.
  • Borsay A. (ed.) Medicine in Wales c. 1800–2000: Public Service or Private Commodity? (University of Wales Press, 2003).
  • Cherry, Stephen. Medical Services and the Hospital in Britain, 1860–1939 (1996) excerpt and text search
  • Dingwall, Helen M. A history of Scottish medicine: themes and influences (Edinburgh UP, 2003).
  • Howe G. M. People, Environment, Death and Disease: A Medical Geography of Britain Through the Ages (U of Wales Press, 1997).
  • Kirby, Peter. Child Workers and Industrial Health in Britain, 1780–1850 (2013).
  • Miller, Ian. A Modern History of the Stomach: Gastric Illness, Medicine and British Society, 1800–1950 (Routledge, 2015).
  • Nagy D. Popular Medicine in Seventeenth-Century England (Bowling Green State UP, 1988).
  • Porter, Roy. Bodies politic: disease, death, and doctors in Britain, 1650–1900 (Cornell UP, 2001). online review
  • Porter, Roy, and Dorothy Porter. In Sickness and in Health: The British Experience, 1650–1850 (1988).
  • Porter, Roy. Mind forg’d manacles: madness and psychiatry in England from restoration to regency (1987).
  • Riley, James C. Sick not dead: the health of British workingmen during the mortality decline (Johns Hopkins UP, 1997).
  • Wall, Rosemary. Bacteria in Britain, 1880–1939 (Routledge, 2015). excerpt
  • Withey Alun (2008). “Unhealthy Neglect? The Medicine and Medical Historiography of Early Modern Wales”. Social History of Medicine. 21 (1): 163–74. CiteSeerX doi:10.1093/shm/hkm113.
  • Withey, Alun. “Health, Medicine and the Family in Wales, c. 1600–1750.” (2009). online
  • Wohl, Anthony S. Endangered Lives: Public Health in Victorian Britain (1983).


  • Andrews, Jonathan (2011). “History of Medicine: Health, Medicine and Disease in the Eighteenth Century”. Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies. 34 (4): 503–15. doi:10.1111/j.1754-0208.2011.00448.x. PMC 4113931. PMID 25083003.
  • Birn Anne-Emanuelle; Necochea López Raúl (2011). “Footprints on the Future: Looking Forward to the History of Health and Medicine in Latin America in the Twenty-First Century”. Hispanic American Historical Review. 91 (3): 503–27. doi:10.1215/00182168-1300164.
  • Brieger, Gert H. “History of Medicine,” in Paul T. Durbin, ed. A Guide to the Culture of Science, Technology, and Medicine (1980) pp. 121–94
  • Burnham, John C. What Is Medical History? (2005) 163 pp. excerpt
  • Chaplin Simon (2016). “Why Creating a Digital Library for the History of Medicine is Harder than You’d Think!”. Medical History. 60 (1): 126–129. doi:10.1017/mdh.2015.83. PMC 4847390. PMID 26651203.
  • Cooter, R. (2007). “After Death/After-‘Life’: The Social History of Medicine in Post-Postmodernity”. Social History of Medicine. 20 (3): 441–64. doi:10.1093/shm/hkm074.
  • Digby, Anne (2008). “The Medical History of South Africa: An Overview”. History Compass. 6 (5): 1194–1210. doi:10.1111/j.1478-0542.2008.00544.x.
  • Gorsky, Martin (2008). “The British National Health Service 1948–2008: A Review of the Historiography”. Social History of Medicine. 21 (3): 437–60. doi:10.1093/shm/hkn064.
  • Green, Monica H. “Gendering the History of Women’s Healthcare,” Gender & History (2008) 20#3 pp. 487–518. online
  • Harrison, Mark (1996). “The Medicalization of War – The Militarization of Medicine”. Social History of Medicine. 9 (2): 267–76. doi:10.1093/shm/9.2.267. PMID 11613451.
  • Huisman, Frank, and John Harley Warner, eds. Locating Medical History: The Stories and Their Meanings (2006) excerpt and text search 530 pp. 21 various essays by scholars
  • Johnson, Jennifer. “New Directions in the History of Medicine in European, Colonial and Transimperial Contexts.” Contemporary European History 25.2 (2016): 387-399 doi:10.1017/S096077731600013
  • Lewenson, Sandra B. and Eleanor Krohn Herrmann, eds. Capturing Nursing History: A Guide to Historical Methods in Research (2008) 236 pp.
  • Lo, Vivienne (2009). “But is it [History of] Medicine? Twenty Years in the History of the Healing Arts of China”. Social History of Medicine. 22 (2): 283–303. doi:10.1093/shm/hkp004. PMC 3304084.
  • Mossensohn, Miri Shefer (2008). “A Tale of Two Discourses: The Historiography of Ottoman–Muslim Medicine”. Social History of Medicine. 21 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1093/shm/hkn002.
  • Sturdy, Steve (2011). “Looking for Trouble: Medical Science and Clinical Practice in the Historiography of Modern Medicine” (PDF). Social History of Medicine. 24 (3): 739–57. doi:10.1093/shm/hkq106.
  • Sweet Helen (2007). “Establishing Connections, Restoring Relationships: Exploring the Historiography of Nursing in Britain”. Gender & History. 19 (3): 565–80. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0424.2007.00490.x.

Primary sources[edit]

  • Elmer, Peter, and Ole Peter Grell, eds. Health, Disease and Society in Europe, 1500–1800: A Sourcebook (, 2004) excerpt and text search
  • Unschuld, Paul U. Huang Di Nei Jing Su Wen: Nature, Knowledge, Imagery in an Ancient Chinese Medical Text. (2003). online
  • Wallis, Faith. ed. Medieval Medicine: A Reader (2010) excerpt and text search
  • Warner, John Harley, and Janet A. Tighe, eds. Major Problems in the History of American Medicine and Public Health (2006), 560 pp; readings in primary and secondary sources excerpt and text search


External links[edit]

Source Article

Next Post

COVID-19 Arkansas Department of Health

Mon Apr 20 , 2020
COVID-19    Please take steps to protect yourself. The ADH recommends: Wash your hands often with soap and water for at least 20 seconds. Use hand sanitizer when soap and water are not available. Practice social distancing. Avoid close contact with others, especially those who are sick, by keeping at […]
COVID-19 Arkansas Department of Health

You May Like